Xeon E7340 vs W-3265M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-3265M
2019, $6,353
24 cores / 48 threads, 205 Watt
20.29
+443%

Xeon W-3265M outperforms Xeon E7340 by a whopping 443% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3541684
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation1.49no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Wno data
Power efficiency4.181.97
DesignerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)no data
Release date3 June 2019 (6 years ago)1 July 2007 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$6,353no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3265M and Xeon E7340 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)no data
Threads48no data
Base clock speed2.7 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHzno data
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier27no data
L1 cache1.5 MBno data
L2 cache24 MBno data
L3 cache33 MB8 MB L2 Cache
Chip lithography14 nm65 nm
Maximum core temperature78 °C66 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
VID voltage rangeno data1.0V-1.5V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3265M and Xeon E7340 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketFCLGA3647PGA604,PPGA604
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt80 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3265M and Xeon E7340. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX+-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Demand Based Switchingno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
FSB parityno data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon W-3265M and Xeon E7340 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3265M and Xeon E7340 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3265M and Xeon E7340. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933no data
Maximum memory size2 TBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3265M and Xeon E7340.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes64no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon W-3265M 20.29
+443%
Xeon E7340 3.74

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon W-3265M 35506
+443%
Samples: 10
Xeon E7340 6544

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.29 3.74
Recency 3 June 2019 1 July 2007
Chip lithography 14 nm 65 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 80 Watt

Xeon W-3265M has a 442.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, and a 364.3% more advanced lithography process.

Xeon E7340, on the other hand, has 156.3% lower power consumption.

The Intel Xeon W-3265M is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon E7340 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3265M
Xeon W-3265M
Intel Xeon E7340
Xeon E7340

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 8 votes

Rate Xeon W-3265M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon E7340 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon W-3265M and Xeon E7340, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.