Core i9-14900HX vs Xeon W-3265M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-3265M
2019
24 cores / 48 threads, 205 Watt
21.21
Core i9-14900HX
2024
24 cores / 32 threads, 55 Watt
29.82
+40.6%

i9-14900HX outperforms Xeon W-3265M by a considerable 41% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-3265M and Core i9-14900HX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking240137
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation18.30no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon WRaptor Lake-HX
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Raptor Lake-HX Refresh
Release date3 June 2019 (5 years ago)8 January 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$6,353no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3265M and Core i9-14900HX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads4832
Base clock speedno data2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed2.7 GHz5.8 GHz
Bus support4 × 8 GT/sno data
L1 cache1.5 MB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache24 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache33 MB36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Die sizeno data257 mm2
Maximum core temperature78 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3265M and Core i9-14900HX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketSocket PIntel BGA 1964
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt55 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3265M and Core i9-14900HX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
TSX++

Security technologies

Xeon W-3265M and Core i9-14900HX technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3265M and Core i9-14900HX are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3265M and Core i9-14900HX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory size2 TiBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/s89.6 GB/s
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics Xe 32EUs (Tiger Lake-H)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3265M and Core i9-14900HX.

PCIe versionno data5.0
PCI Express lanes6416

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-3265M 21.21
i9-14900HX 29.82
+40.6%

Core i9-14900HX outperforms Xeon W-3265M by 41% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 65%

Xeon W-3265M 32810
i9-14900HX 46119
+40.6%

Core i9-14900HX outperforms Xeon W-3265M by 41% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 40%

Xeon W-3265M 997
i9-14900HX 2740
+175%

Core i9-14900HX outperforms Xeon W-3265M by 175% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 40%

Xeon W-3265M 7681
i9-14900HX 16240
+111%

Core i9-14900HX outperforms Xeon W-3265M by 111% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 21.21 29.82
Recency 3 June 2019 8 January 2024
Threads 48 32
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 55 Watt

Xeon W-3265M has 50% more threads.

i9-14900HX, on the other hand, has a 40.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 272.7% lower power consumption.

The Core i9-14900HX is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W-3265M in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon W-3265M is a server/workstation processor while Core i9-14900HX is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3265M and Core i9-14900HX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3265M
Xeon W-3265M
Intel Core i9-14900HX
Core i9-14900HX

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Error: Запрос select b.cpu_id from ss_cpu_benchmarks_results as b left join ss_cpu as i on i._id=b.cpu_id and i._disabled=0 and i.redirect_to=0 left join ss_cpu_custom as custom on custom.filename=i.filename and custom._disabled=0 left join ss_stat_exist as pop on pop.item_type="cpu" and pop.item1=i._id and pop.item2=2875 and pop.lang="2" left join ss_stat_exist as pop2 on pop2.item_type="cpu" and pop2.item1=2875 and pop2.item2=i._id and pop2.lang="2" where b.benchmark_id=-1 and i.type="Server/Workstation" and i.prof="1" and i._disabled=0 and ( if(pop.visits,pop.visits,pop2.visits)>=1 OR ( to_days(now()) - to_days(replace("2019-06-03","-00","-01"))<=366/2 OR to_days(now()) - to_days(replace(if(custom.date_of_announcement AND custom.date_of_announcement!="0000-01-00",custom.date_of_announcement,i.date_of_announcement),"-00","-01"))<=366/2 ) ) having !isnull(i._id) order by abs(21.21 - b.result) asc /* # 1 */ limit 6 вызвал ошибку Unknown column 'i._id' in 'having clause'

Array
(
    [0] => Array
        (
            [file] => /var/www/web/data/www/technical.city/system/lib/db.php
            [line] => 151
            [function] => db_query
            [args] => Array
                (
                    [0] => select b.cpu_id from ss_cpu_benchmarks_results as b
			left join ss_cpu as i
			on i._id=b.cpu_id and i._disabled=0 and i.redirect_to=0
			
			left join
			ss_cpu_custom as custom on custom.filename=i.filename and custom._disabled=0
			left join
			ss_stat_exist as pop
			on pop.item_type="cpu" and pop.item1=i._id and pop.item2=2875 and pop.lang="2"
			left join
			ss_stat_exist as pop2
			on pop2.item_type="cpu" and pop2.item1=2875 and pop2.item2=i._id and pop2.lang="2"
			
			where b.benchmark_id=-1 and i.type="Server/Workstation" and i.prof="1" and i._disabled=0
			and

			(
			if(pop.visits,pop.visits,pop2.visits)>=1
			OR
			(
			to_days(now()) - to_days(replace("2019-06-03","-00","-01"))<=366/2
			OR
			to_days(now()) - to_days(replace(if(custom.date_of_announcement AND custom.date_of_announcement!="0000-01-00",custom.date_of_announcement,i.date_of_announcement),"-00","-01"))<=366/2
			)
			)
			having !isnull(i._id)
			order by abs(21.21 - b.result) asc /* # 1 */ limit 6
                )

        )

    [1] => Array
        (
            [file] => /var/www/web/data/www/technical.city/_content/textblocks/text/85/85
            [line] => 150
            [function] => db_getItems
            [args] => Array
                (
                    [0] => select b.cpu_id from ss_cpu_benchmarks_results as b
			left join ss_cpu as i
			on i._id=b.cpu_id and i._disabled=0 and i.redirect_to=0
			
			left join
			ss_cpu_custom as custom on custom.filename=i.filename and custom._disabled=0
			left join
			ss_stat_exist as pop
			on pop.item_type="cpu" and pop.item1=i._id and pop.item2=2875 and pop.lang="2"
			left join
			ss_stat_exist as pop2
			on pop2.item_type="cpu" and pop2.item1=2875 and pop2.item2=i._id and pop2.lang="2"
			
			where b.benchmark_id=-1 and i.type="Server/Workstation" and i.prof="1" and i._disabled=0
			and

			(
			if(pop.visits,pop.visits,pop2.visits)>=1
			OR
			(
			to_days(now()) - to_days(replace("2019-06-03","-00","-01"))<=366/2
			OR
			to_days(now()) - to_days(replace(if(custom.date_of_announcement AND custom.date_of_announcement!="0000-01-00",custom.date_of_announcement,i.date_of_announcement),"-00","-01"))<=366/2
			)
			)
			having !isnull(i._id)
			order by abs(21.21 - b.result) asc /* # 1 */ limit 6
                )

        )

    [2] => Array
        (
            [file] => /var/www/web/data/www/technical.city/_content/textblocks/text/22/222
            [line] => 16525
            [function] => db_cache
            [args] => Array
                (
                    [0] => nearest_cpu_Server/Workstation_1_2875_L2
                    [1] => db_getItems
                    [2] => select b.cpu_id from ss_cpu_benchmarks_results as b
			left join ss_cpu as i
			on i._id=b.cpu_id and i._disabled=0 and i.redirect_to=0
			
			left join
			ss_cpu_custom as custom on custom.filename=i.filename and custom._disabled=0
			left join
			ss_stat_exist as pop
			on pop.item_type="cpu" and pop.item1=i._id and pop.item2=2875 and pop.lang="2"
			left join
			ss_stat_exist as pop2
			on pop2.item_type="cpu" and pop2.item1=2875 and pop2.item2=i._id and pop2.lang="2"
			
			where b.benchmark_id=-1 and i.type="Server/Workstation" and i.prof="1" and i._disabled=0
			and

			(
			if(pop.visits,pop.visits,pop2.visits)>=1
			OR
			(
			to_days(now()) - to_days(replace("2019-06-03","-00","-01"))<=366/2
			OR
			to_days(now()) - to_days(replace(if(custom.date_of_announcement AND custom.date_of_announcement!="0000-01-00",custom.date_of_announcement,i.date_of_announcement),"-00","-01"))<=366/2
			)
			)
			having !isnull(i._id)
			order by abs(21.21 - b.result) asc /* # 1 */ limit 6
                    [3] => Array
                        (
                            [0] => ss_cpu_benchmarks_results
                            [1] => ss_cpu
                        )

                )

        )

    [3] => Array
        (
            [file] => /var/www/web/data/www/technical.city/_content/pages/text/24/324_1
            [line] => 15
            [args] => Array
                (
                    [0] => /var/www/web/data/www/technical.city/_content/textblocks/text/22/222
                )

            [function] => include
        )

    [4] => Array
        (
            [file] => /var/www/web/data/www/technical.city/system/handler/index.php
            [line] => 372
            [args] => Array
                (
                    [0] => /var/www/web/data/www/technical.city/_content/pages/text/24/324_1
                )

            [function] => require
        )

)

Error: Запрос select b.cpu_id from ss_cpu_benchmarks_results as b left join ss_cpu as i on i._id=b.cpu_id and i._disabled=0 and i.redirect_to=0 left join ss_cpu_custom as custom on custom.filename=i.filename and custom._disabled=0 left join ss_stat_exist as pop on pop.item_type="cpu" and pop.item1=i._id and pop.item2=6471 and pop.lang="2" left join ss_stat_exist as pop2 on pop2.item_type="cpu" and pop2.item1=6471 and pop2.item2=i._id and pop2.lang="2" where b.benchmark_id=-1 and i.type="Server/Workstation" and i.prof="1" and i._disabled=0 and ( if(pop.visits,pop.visits,pop2.visits)>=1 OR ( to_days(now()) - to_days(replace("2024-01-08","-00","-01"))<=366/2 OR to_days(now()) - to_days(replace(if(custom.date_of_announcement AND custom.date_of_announcement!="0000-01-00",custom.date_of_announcement,i.date_of_announcement),"-00","-01"))<=366/2 ) ) having !isnull(i._id) order by abs(29.82 - b.result) asc /* # 2 */ limit 6 вызвал ошибку Unknown column 'i._id' in 'having clause'

Array
(
    [0] => Array
        (
            [file] => /var/www/web/data/www/technical.city/system/lib/db.php
            [line] => 151
            [function] => db_query
            [args] => Array
                (
                    [0] => select b.cpu_id from ss_cpu_benchmarks_results as b
			left join ss_cpu as i
			on i._id=b.cpu_id and i._disabled=0 and i.redirect_to=0
			
			left join
			ss_cpu_custom as custom on custom.filename=i.filename and custom._disabled=0
			left join
			ss_stat_exist as pop
			on pop.item_type="cpu" and pop.item1=i._id and pop.item2=6471 and pop.lang="2"
			left join
			ss_stat_exist as pop2
			on pop2.item_type="cpu" and pop2.item1=6471 and pop2.item2=i._id and pop2.lang="2"
			
			where b.benchmark_id=-1 and i.type="Server/Workstation" and i.prof="1" and i._disabled=0
			and

			(
			if(pop.visits,pop.visits,pop2.visits)>=1
			OR
			(
			to_days(now()) - to_days(replace("2024-01-08","-00","-01"))<=366/2
			OR
			to_days(now()) - to_days(replace(if(custom.date_of_announcement AND custom.date_of_announcement!="0000-01-00",custom.date_of_announcement,i.date_of_announcement),"-00","-01"))<=366/2
			)
			)
			having !isnull(i._id)
			order by abs(29.82 - b.result) asc /* # 2 */ limit 6
                )

        )

    [1] => Array
        (
            [file] => /var/www/web/data/www/technical.city/_content/textblocks/text/85/85
            [line] => 150
            [function] => db_getItems
            [args] => Array
                (
                    [0] => select b.cpu_id from ss_cpu_benchmarks_results as b
			left join ss_cpu as i
			on i._id=b.cpu_id and i._disabled=0 and i.redirect_to=0
			
			left join
			ss_cpu_custom as custom on custom.filename=i.filename and custom._disabled=0
			left join
			ss_stat_exist as pop
			on pop.item_type="cpu" and pop.item1=i._id and pop.item2=6471 and pop.lang="2"
			left join
			ss_stat_exist as pop2
			on pop2.item_type="cpu" and pop2.item1=6471 and pop2.item2=i._id and pop2.lang="2"
			
			where b.benchmark_id=-1 and i.type="Server/Workstation" and i.prof="1" and i._disabled=0
			and

			(
			if(pop.visits,pop.visits,pop2.visits)>=1
			OR
			(
			to_days(now()) - to_days(replace("2024-01-08","-00","-01"))<=366/2
			OR
			to_days(now()) - to_days(replace(if(custom.date_of_announcement AND custom.date_of_announcement!="0000-01-00",custom.date_of_announcement,i.date_of_announcement),"-00","-01"))<=366/2
			)
			)
			having !isnull(i._id)
			order by abs(29.82 - b.result) asc /* # 2 */ limit 6
                )

        )

    [2] => Array
        (
            [file] => /var/www/web/data/www/technical.city/_content/textblocks/text/22/222
            [line] => 16525
            [function] => db_cache
            [args] => Array
                (
                    [0] => nearest_cpu_Server/Workstation_1_6471_L2
                    [1] => db_getItems
                    [2] => select b.cpu_id from ss_cpu_benchmarks_results as b
			left join ss_cpu as i
			on i._id=b.cpu_id and i._disabled=0 and i.redirect_to=0
			
			left join
			ss_cpu_custom as custom on custom.filename=i.filename and custom._disabled=0
			left join
			ss_stat_exist as pop
			on pop.item_type="cpu" and pop.item1=i._id and pop.item2=6471 and pop.lang="2"
			left join
			ss_stat_exist as pop2
			on pop2.item_type="cpu" and pop2.item1=6471 and pop2.item2=i._id and pop2.lang="2"
			
			where b.benchmark_id=-1 and i.type="Server/Workstation" and i.prof="1" and i._disabled=0
			and

			(
			if(pop.visits,pop.visits,pop2.visits)>=1
			OR
			(
			to_days(now()) - to_days(replace("2024-01-08","-00","-01"))<=366/2
			OR
			to_days(now()) - to_days(replace(if(custom.date_of_announcement AND custom.date_of_announcement!="0000-01-00",custom.date_of_announcement,i.date_of_announcement),"-00","-01"))<=366/2
			)
			)
			having !isnull(i._id)
			order by abs(29.82 - b.result) asc /* # 2 */ limit 6
                    [3] => Array
                        (
                            [0] => ss_cpu_benchmarks_results
                            [1] => ss_cpu
                        )

                )

        )

    [3] => Array
        (
            [file] => /var/www/web/data/www/technical.city/_content/pages/text/24/324_1
            [line] => 15
            [args] => Array
                (
                    [0] => /var/www/web/data/www/technical.city/_content/textblocks/text/22/222
                )

            [function] => include
        )

    [4] => Array
        (
            [file] => /var/www/web/data/www/technical.city/system/handler/index.php
            [line] => 372
            [args] => Array
                (
                    [0] => /var/www/web/data/www/technical.city/_content/pages/text/24/324_1
                )

            [function] => require
        )

)

Error: Запрос select b.cpu_id from ss_cpu_benchmarks_results as b left join ss_cpu as i on i._id=b.cpu_id and i._disabled=0 and i.redirect_to=0 left join ss_cpu_custom as custom on custom.filename=i.filename and custom._disabled=0 left join ss_stat_exist as pop on pop.item_type="cpu" and pop.item1=i._id and pop.item2=2875 and pop.lang="2" left join ss_stat_exist as pop2 on pop2.item_type="cpu" and pop2.item1=2875 and pop2.item2=i._id and pop2.lang="2" where b.benchmark_id=-1 and i.type="Server/Workstation" and i.prof="1" and i._disabled=0 and ( if(pop.visits,pop.visits,pop2.visits)>=1 OR ( to_days(now()) - to_days(replace("2019-06-03","-00","-01"))<=366/2 OR to_days(now()) - to_days(replace(if(custom.date_of_announcement AND custom.date_of_announcement!="0000-01-00",custom.date_of_announcement,i.date_of_announcement),"-00","-01"))<=366/2 ) ) having !isnull(i._id) order by abs(21.21 - b.result) asc /* # 1 */ limit 6 вызвал ошибку Unknown column 'i._id' in 'having clause'

Array
(
    [0] => Array
        (
            [file] => /var/www/web/data/www/technical.city/system/lib/db.php
            [line] => 151
            [function] => db_query
            [args] => Array
                (
                    [0] => select b.cpu_id from ss_cpu_benchmarks_results as b
			left join ss_cpu as i
			on i._id=b.cpu_id and i._disabled=0 and i.redirect_to=0
			
			left join
			ss_cpu_custom as custom on custom.filename=i.filename and custom._disabled=0
			left join
			ss_stat_exist as pop
			on pop.item_type="cpu" and pop.item1=i._id and pop.item2=2875 and pop.lang="2"
			left join
			ss_stat_exist as pop2
			on pop2.item_type="cpu" and pop2.item1=2875 and pop2.item2=i._id and pop2.lang="2"
			
			where b.benchmark_id=-1 and i.type="Server/Workstation" and i.prof="1" and i._disabled=0
			and

			(
			if(pop.visits,pop.visits,pop2.visits)>=1
			OR
			(
			to_days(now()) - to_days(replace("2019-06-03","-00","-01"))<=366/2
			OR
			to_days(now()) - to_days(replace(if(custom.date_of_announcement AND custom.date_of_announcement!="0000-01-00",custom.date_of_announcement,i.date_of_announcement),"-00","-01"))<=366/2
			)
			)
			having !isnull(i._id)
			order by abs(21.21 - b.result) asc /* # 1 */ limit 6
                )

        )

    [1] => Array
        (
            [file] => /var/www/web/data/www/technical.city/_content/textblocks/text/85/85
            [line] => 150
            [function] => db_getItems
            [args] => Array
                (
                    [0] => select b.cpu_id from ss_cpu_benchmarks_results as b
			left join ss_cpu as i
			on i._id=b.cpu_id and i._disabled=0 and i.redirect_to=0
			
			left join
			ss_cpu_custom as custom on custom.filename=i.filename and custom._disabled=0
			left join
			ss_stat_exist as pop
			on pop.item_type="cpu" and pop.item1=i._id and pop.item2=2875 and pop.lang="2"
			left join
			ss_stat_exist as pop2
			on pop2.item_type="cpu" and pop2.item1=2875 and pop2.item2=i._id and pop2.lang="2"
			
			where b.benchmark_id=-1 and i.type="Server/Workstation" and i.prof="1" and i._disabled=0
			and

			(
			if(pop.visits,pop.visits,pop2.visits)>=1
			OR
			(
			to_days(now()) - to_days(replace("2019-06-03","-00","-01"))<=366/2
			OR
			to_days(now()) - to_days(replace(if(custom.date_of_announcement AND custom.date_of_announcement!="0000-01-00",custom.date_of_announcement,i.date_of_announcement),"-00","-01"))<=366/2
			)
			)
			having !isnull(i._id)
			order by abs(21.21 - b.result) asc /* # 1 */ limit 6
                )

        )

    [2] => Array
        (
            [file] => /var/www/web/data/www/technical.city/_content/textblocks/text/22/222
            [line] => 16525
            [function] => db_cache
            [args] => Array
                (
                    [0] => nearest_cpu_Server/Workstation_1_2875_L2
                    [1] => db_getItems
                    [2] => select b.cpu_id from ss_cpu_benchmarks_results as b
			left join ss_cpu as i
			on i._id=b.cpu_id and i._disabled=0 and i.redirect_to=0
			
			left join
			ss_cpu_custom as custom on custom.filename=i.filename and custom._disabled=0
			left join
			ss_stat_exist as pop
			on pop.item_type="cpu" and pop.item1=i._id and pop.item2=2875 and pop.lang="2"
			left join
			ss_stat_exist as pop2
			on pop2.item_type="cpu" and pop2.item1=2875 and pop2.item2=i._id and pop2.lang="2"
			
			where b.benchmark_id=-1 and i.type="Server/Workstation" and i.prof="1" and i._disabled=0
			and

			(
			if(pop.visits,pop.visits,pop2.visits)>=1
			OR
			(
			to_days(now()) - to_days(replace("2019-06-03","-00","-01"))<=366/2
			OR
			to_days(now()) - to_days(replace(if(custom.date_of_announcement AND custom.date_of_announcement!="0000-01-00",custom.date_of_announcement,i.date_of_announcement),"-00","-01"))<=366/2
			)
			)
			having !isnull(i._id)
			order by abs(21.21 - b.result) asc /* # 1 */ limit 6
                    [3] => Array
                        (
                            [0] => ss_cpu_benchmarks_results
                            [1] => ss_cpu
                        )

                )

        )

    [3] => Array
        (
            [file] => /var/www/web/data/www/technical.city/_content/pages/text/24/324_1
            [line] => 15
            [args] => Array
                (
                    [0] => /var/www/web/data/www/technical.city/_content/textblocks/text/22/222
                )

            [function] => include
        )

    [4] => Array
        (
            [file] => /var/www/web/data/www/technical.city/system/handler/index.php
            [line] => 372
            [args] => Array
                (
                    [0] => /var/www/web/data/www/technical.city/_content/pages/text/24/324_1
                )

            [function] => require
        )

)

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 2 votes

Rate Xeon W-3265M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 209 votes

Rate Core i9-14900HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3265M or Core i9-14900HX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.