Xeon W-1290TE vs W-3265

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-3265
2019
24 cores / 48 threads, 205 Watt
17.13
+108%

Xeon W-3265 outperforms Xeon W-1290TE by a whopping 108% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking4071000
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.396.68
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Wno data
Power efficiency3.539.96
DesignerIntelIntel
Manufacturerno dataIntel
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Comet Lake (2020−2025)
Release date3 June 2019 (6 years ago)13 May 2020 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,349$552

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon W-1290TE has 179% better value for money than Xeon W-3265.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3265 and Xeon W-1290TE basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads4820
Base clock speed2.7 GHz1.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz4.5 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier27no data
L1 cache1.5 MB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache24 MB256 KB (per core)
L3 cache33 MB20 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die sizeno data206 mm2
Maximum core temperature78 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3265 and Xeon W-1290TE compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA36471200
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3265 and Xeon W-1290TE. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon W-3265 and Xeon W-1290TE technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3265 and Xeon W-1290TE are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3265 and Xeon W-1290TE. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR4
Maximum memory size1 TBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics P630

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3265 and Xeon W-1290TE.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes6416

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon W-3265 17.13
+108%
Xeon W-1290TE 8.25

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon W-3265 30105
+108%
Samples: 2
Xeon W-1290TE 14505
Samples: 9

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.13 8.25
Recency 3 June 2019 13 May 2020
Physical cores 24 10
Threads 48 20
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 35 Watt

Xeon W-3265 has a 107.6% higher aggregate performance score, and 140% more physical cores and 140% more threads.

Xeon W-1290TE, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months, and 485.7% lower power consumption.

The Intel Xeon W-3265 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon W-1290TE in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3265
Xeon W-3265
Intel Xeon W-1290TE
Xeon W-1290TE

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 11 votes

Rate Xeon W-3265 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon W-1290TE on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon W-3265 and Xeon W-1290TE, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.