Xeon Gold 5318H vs W-3265
Aggregate performance score
Xeon W-3265 outperforms Xeon Gold 5318H by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 397 | 413 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 2.46 | no data |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Series | Intel Xeon W | no data |
| Power efficiency | 3.53 | 4.70 |
| Designer | Intel | Intel |
| Manufacturer | no data | Intel |
| Architecture codename | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) | Cooper Lake-SP (2021) |
| Release date | 3 June 2019 (6 years ago) | 6 April 2021 (4 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $3,349 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Xeon W-3265 and Xeon Gold 5318H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) | 18 (Octadeca-Core) |
| Threads | 48 | 36 |
| Base clock speed | 2.7 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.6 GHz | 3.8 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 3.0 | no data |
| Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | no data |
| Multiplier | 27 | no data |
| L1 cache | 1.5 MB | 64K (per core) |
| L2 cache | 24 MB | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 33 MB | 24.75 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 78 °C | no data |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon W-3265 and Xeon Gold 5318H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 4 |
| Socket | FCLGA3647 | FCLGA4189 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 205 Watt | 150 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3265 and Xeon Gold 5318H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® AVX-512 | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Speed Shift | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | + |
| TSX | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | + | no data |
| Deep Learning Boost | + | + |
Security technologies
Xeon W-3265 and Xeon Gold 5318H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
| EDB | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3265 and Xeon Gold 5318H are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3265 and Xeon Gold 5318H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2933 | DDR4 RDIMM |
| Maximum memory size | 1 TB | 1.12 TB |
| Max memory channels | 6 | 6 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 140.8 GB/s | no data |
| ECC memory support | + | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3265 and Xeon Gold 5318H.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 64 | 48 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 17.13 | 16.67 |
| Recency | 3 June 2019 | 6 April 2021 |
| Physical cores | 24 | 18 |
| Threads | 48 | 36 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 205 Watt | 150 Watt |
Xeon W-3265 has a 2.8% higher aggregate performance score, and 33.3% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads.
Xeon Gold 5318H, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 36.7% lower power consumption.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Intel Xeon W-3265 and Intel Xeon Gold 5318H.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
