Xeon 6736P vs W-3265

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-3265
2019
24 cores / 48 threads, 205 Watt
17.04
Xeon 6736P
2025
36 cores / 72 threads, 205 Watt
28.34
+66.3%

Xeon 6736P outperforms Xeon W-3265 by an impressive 66% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking420200
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.33no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Wno data
Power efficiency3.545.88
DesignerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)no data
Release date3 June 2019 (6 years ago)1 January 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,349no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3265 and Xeon 6736P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)36
Threads4872
Base clock speed2.7 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz4.1 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier27no data
L1 cache1.5 MBno data
L2 cache24 MBno data
L3 cache33 MB144 MB
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 3 nm
Maximum core temperature78 °C87 °C
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3265 and Xeon 6736P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA4710
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3265 and Xeon 6736P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512, Intel® AMX
AES-NI++
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Xeon W-3265 and Xeon 6736P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
SGXno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3265 and Xeon 6736P are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3265 and Xeon 6736P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR5(6400MT/s)
Maximum memory size1 TB4 TB
Max memory channels68
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3265 and Xeon 6736P.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes6488

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon W-3265 17.04
Xeon 6736P 28.34
+66.3%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon W-3265 30105
Samples: 2
Xeon 6736P 50072
+66.3%
Samples: 6

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.04 28.34
Recency 3 June 2019 1 January 2025
Physical cores 24 36
Threads 48 72

Xeon 6736P has a 66.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

The Intel Xeon 6736P is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon W-3265 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3265
Xeon W-3265
Intel Xeon 6736P
Xeon 6736P

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 11 votes

Rate Xeon W-3265 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon 6736P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon W-3265 and Xeon 6736P, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.