Itanium 9760 vs Xeon W-3265

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking434not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.25no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Wno data
Power efficiency3.54no data
DesignerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)no data
Release date3 June 2019 (6 years ago)1 April 2017 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,349no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3265 and Itanium 9760 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads4816
Base clock speed2.7 GHz2.66 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHzno data
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s6.4 GT/s
Multiplier27no data
L1 cache1.5 MBno data
L2 cache24 MBno data
L3 cache33 MB32 MB
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Maximum core temperature78 °C95 °C
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3265 and Itanium 9760 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketFCLGA3647LGA1248
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt170 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3265 and Itanium 9760. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI+-
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon W-3265 and Itanium 9760 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3265 and Itanium 9760 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
VT-ino data+
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3265 and Itanium 9760. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933no data
Maximum memory size1 TBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3265 and Itanium 9760.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes64no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 June 2019 1 April 2017
Physical cores 24 8
Threads 48 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 170 Watt

Xeon W-3265 has an age advantage of 2 years, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

Itanium 9760, on the other hand, has 20.6% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Intel Xeon W-3265 and Intel Itanium 9760. We've got no test results to judge.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3265
Xeon W-3265
Intel Itanium 9760
Itanium 9760

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 11 votes

Rate Xeon W-3265 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 8 votes

Rate Itanium 9760 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon W-3265 and Itanium 9760, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.