EPYC 7282 vs Xeon W-3265

#ad
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Xeon W-3265
2019
24 cores / 48 threads
19.47
+0.9%
EPYC 7282
2019
16 cores / 32 threads
19.30

Xeon W-3265 outperforms EPYC 7282 by 1% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

General info

Comparing Xeon W-3265 and EPYC 7282 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking262265
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Value for money1.1313.66
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon WAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Zen 2 (2019−2020)
Release date3 June 2019 (4 years old)7 August 2019 (4 years old)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,349$650
Current price$10576 (3.2x MSRP)$965 (1.5x MSRP)

Value for money

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7282 has 1109% better value for money than Xeon W-3265.

Technical specs

Xeon W-3265 and EPYC 7282 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads4832
Base clock speed2.7 GHz2.8 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus support4 × 8 GT/sno data
L1 cache1.5 MB1 MB
L2 cache24 MB8 MB
L3 cache33 MB64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die sizeno data192 mm2
Maximum core temperature78 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3265 and EPYC 7282 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCLGA3647TR4
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3265 and EPYC 7282. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
StatusLaunchedno data

Security technologies

Xeon W-3265 and EPYC 7282 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3265 and EPYC 7282 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3265 and EPYC 7282. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size1 TB4 TiB
Max memory channels68
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3265 and EPYC 7282.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes64no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-3265 19.47
+0.9%
EPYC 7282 19.30

Xeon W-3265 outperforms EPYC 7282 by 1% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon W-3265 30105
+0.9%
EPYC 7282 29846

Xeon W-3265 outperforms EPYC 7282 by 1% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Advantages and disadvantages


Performance score 19.47 19.30
Recency 3 June 2019 7 August 2019
Physical cores 24 16
Threads 48 32
Cost $3349 $650
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 120 Watt

We couldn't decide between Xeon W-3265 and EPYC 7282. The differences in performance seem too small.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3265 and EPYC 7282, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3265
Xeon W-3265
AMD EPYC 7282
EPYC 7282

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

User Ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 11 votes

Rate Xeon W-3265 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 42 votes

Rate EPYC 7282 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions and comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3265 or EPYC 7282, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.