i9-10880H vs Xeon W-3265

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-3265
2019, $3,349
24 cores / 48 threads, 205 Watt
17.04
+111%

Xeon W-3265 outperforms Core i9-10880H by a whopping 111% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking4331056
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.27no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon WIntel Comet Lake
Power efficiency8.93no data
DesignerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Comet Lake-H (2020)
Release date3 June 2019 (6 years ago)2 April 2020 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$3,349no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3265 and Core i9-10880H basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores24 (Tetracosa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads4816
Base clock speed2.7 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier27no data
L1 cache1.5 MB512 KB
L2 cache24 MB2 MB
L3 cache33 MB16 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature78 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3265 and Core i9-10880H compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketFCLGA3647FCBGA1440
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt2 MB + 16 MB

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3265 and Core i9-10880H. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon W-3265 and Core i9-10880H technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3265 and Core i9-10880H are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3265 and Core i9-10880H. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR4
Maximum memory size1 TBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 630 (350 - 1200 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3265 and Core i9-10880H.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes64no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon W-3265 17.04
+111%
i9-10880H 8.06

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon W-3265 30105
+111%
Samples: 2
i9-10880H 14240
Samples: 19

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.04 8.06
Recency 3 June 2019 2 April 2020
Physical cores 24 8
Threads 48 16
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 2 Watt

Xeon W-3265 has a 111.4% higher aggregate performance score, and 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads.

i9-10880H, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 months, and 10150% lower power consumption.

The Intel Xeon W-3265 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Core i9-10880H in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon W-3265 is a server/workstation processor while Core i9-10880H is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3265
Xeon W-3265
Intel Core i9-10880H
Core i9-10880H

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3 11 votes

Rate Xeon W-3265 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 61 votes

Rate Core i9-10880H on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon W-3265 and Core i9-10880H, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.