Ryzen Z2 Extreme vs Xeon W-3245

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-3245
2019, $1,999
16 cores / 32 threads, 205 Watt
17.64
+28.6%

Xeon W-3245 outperforms Ryzen Z2 Extreme by a significant 29% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking408607
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.02no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon WAMD Strix Halo/Point (Zen 5/5c, Ryzen AI 300)
Power efficiency9.23no data
DesignerIntelAMD
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Strix Point (Zen 5) (2025)
Release date3 June 2019 (6 years ago)6 January 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,999no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3245 and Ryzen Z2 Extreme basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads3216
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz5 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier32no data
L1 cache1 MBno data
L2 cache16 MB8 MB
L3 cache22 MB16 MB
Chip lithography14 nm4 nm
Maximum core temperature77 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3245 and Ryzen Z2 Extreme compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketFCLGA3647FP8
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt8 MB + 16 MB

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3245 and Ryzen Z2 Extreme. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512USB 4, XDNA 2 NPU (50 TOPS), Secure Processor, SMT, AES, AVX, AVX2, AVX512, FMA3, MMX (+), SHA, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4A
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon W-3245 and Ryzen Z2 Extreme technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3245 and Ryzen Z2 Extreme are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3245 and Ryzen Z2 Extreme. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR5
Maximum memory size1 TBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 890M

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3245 and Ryzen Z2 Extreme.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes64no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon W-3245 17.64
+28.6%
Ryzen Z2 Extreme 13.72

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon W-3245 31089
+28.6%
Samples: 92
Ryzen Z2 Extreme 24177
Samples: 7

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.64 13.72
Recency 3 June 2019 6 January 2025
Physical cores 16 8
Threads 32 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 8 Watt

Xeon W-3245 has a 28.6% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

Ryzen Z2 Extreme, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 250% more advanced lithography process, and 2462.5% lower power consumption.

The Intel Xeon W-3245 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon W-3245 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen Z2 Extreme is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3245
Xeon W-3245
AMD Ryzen Z2 Extreme
Ryzen Z2 Extreme

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 5 votes

Rate Xeon W-3245 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 58 votes

Rate Ryzen Z2 Extreme on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon W-3245 and Ryzen Z2 Extreme, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.