EPYC 75F3 vs Xeon W-3245

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-3245
2019
16 cores / 32 threads, 205 Watt
19.93
EPYC 75F3
2021
32 cores / 64 threads, 280 Watt
44.29
+122%

EPYC 75F3 outperforms Xeon W-3245 by a whopping 122% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-3245 and EPYC 75F3 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking25741
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.6812.26
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon WAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Milan (2021)
Release date3 June 2019 (5 years ago)15 March 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,999$4,860
Current price$4274 (2.1x MSRP)$3300 (0.7x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 75F3 has 116% better value for money than Xeon W-3245.

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3245 and EPYC 75F3 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads3264
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.95 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz4 GHz
Bus support4 × 8 GT/sno data
L1 cache1 MB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache16 MB512 KB (per core)
L3 cache22 MB256 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm+
Die sizeno data8x 81 mm2
Maximum core temperature77 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data33,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3245 and EPYC 75F3 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketFCLGA3647SP3
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt280 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3245 and EPYC 75F3. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
StatusLaunchedno data

Security technologies

Xeon W-3245 and EPYC 75F3 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3245 and EPYC 75F3 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3245 and EPYC 75F3. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size1 TB4 TiB
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/s204.795 GB/s
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3245 and EPYC 75F3.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes64128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-3245 19.93
EPYC 75F3 44.29
+122%

EPYC 75F3 outperforms Xeon W-3245 by 122% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon W-3245 30824
EPYC 75F3 68505
+122%

EPYC 75F3 outperforms Xeon W-3245 by 122% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon W-3245 1390
EPYC 75F3 1826
+31.4%

EPYC 75F3 outperforms Xeon W-3245 by 31% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon W-3245 11659
EPYC 75F3 16432
+40.9%

EPYC 75F3 outperforms Xeon W-3245 by 41% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.93 44.29
Recency 3 June 2019 15 March 2021
Physical cores 16 32
Threads 32 64
Cost $1999 $4860
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 280 Watt

The EPYC 75F3 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W-3245 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3245 and EPYC 75F3, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3245
Xeon W-3245
AMD EPYC 75F3
EPYC 75F3

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Xeon W-3245 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate EPYC 75F3 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3245 or EPYC 75F3, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.