EPYC 7272 vs Xeon W-3245

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-3245
2019
16 cores / 32 threads, 205 Watt
19.93
+20.6%

Xeon W-3245 outperforms EPYC 7272 by a significant 21% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-3245 and EPYC 7272 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking258364
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation5.6849.27
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon WAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Zen 2 (2019−2020)
Release date3 June 2019 (5 years ago)7 August 2019 (4 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,999$625
Current price$4274 (2.1x MSRP)$195 (0.3x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7272 has 767% better value for money than Xeon W-3245.

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3245 and EPYC 7272 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads3224
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz3.2 GHz
Bus support4 × 8 GT/sno data
L1 cache1 MB768 KB
L2 cache16 MB6 MB
L3 cache22 MB64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die sizeno data192 mm2
Maximum core temperature77 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data4,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoYes

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3245 and EPYC 7272 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCLGA3647TR4
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt120 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3245 and EPYC 7272. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
StatusLaunchedno data

Security technologies

Xeon W-3245 and EPYC 7272 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3245 and EPYC 7272 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3245 and EPYC 7272. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size1 TB4 TiB
Max memory channels68
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3245 and EPYC 7272.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes64no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-3245 19.93
+20.6%
EPYC 7272 16.53

Xeon W-3245 outperforms EPYC 7272 by 21% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon W-3245 30824
+20.6%
EPYC 7272 25568

Xeon W-3245 outperforms EPYC 7272 by 21% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 19.93 16.53
Recency 3 June 2019 7 August 2019
Physical cores 16 12
Threads 32 24
Cost $1999 $625
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 120 Watt

The Xeon W-3245 is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7272 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3245 and EPYC 7272, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3245
Xeon W-3245
AMD EPYC 7272
EPYC 7272

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Xeon W-3245 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.2 21 vote

Rate EPYC 7272 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3245 or EPYC 7272, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.