Celeron J3355E vs Xeon W-3245

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking408not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.05no data
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon Wno data
Power efficiency9.22no data
DesignerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)no data
Release date3 June 2019 (6 years ago)1 July 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,999no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3245 and Celeron J3355E basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads322
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.6 GHz2.5 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier32no data
L1 cache1 MBno data
L2 cache16 MBno data
L3 cache22 MB2 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature77 °C105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3245 and Celeron J3355E compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647no data
Power consumption (TDP)205 Watt10 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3245 and Celeron J3355E. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0-
Hyper-Threading Technology+-
TSX+-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Smart Responseno data-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon W-3245 and Celeron J3355E technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+-
EDB++
Identity Protection-+
OS Guardno data-
Anti-Theftno data-

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3245 and Celeron J3355E are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
VT-ino data-
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3245 and Celeron J3355E. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR3L/LPDDR3 up to 1866 MT/s; LPDDR4 up to 2400 MT/s
Maximum memory size1 TB8 GB
Max memory channels62
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel HD Graphics 500
Max video memoryno data8 GB
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Videono data+
Clear Video HDno data+
Execution Unitsno data12

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon W-3245 and Celeron J3355E integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data3
eDPno data+
DisplayPort-+
HDMI-+
MIPI-DSIno data+

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon W-3245 and Celeron J3355E integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data+
OpenGLno data+

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3245 and Celeron J3355E.

PCIe version3.02.0
PCI Express lanes646

Pros & cons summary


Physical cores 16 2
Threads 32 2
Power consumption (TDP) 205 Watt 10 Watt

Xeon W-3245 has 700% more physical cores and 1500% more threads.

Celeron J3355E, on the other hand, has 1950% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Intel Xeon W-3245 and Intel Celeron J3355E. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon W-3245 is a server/workstation processor while Celeron J3355E is a desktop one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3245
Xeon W-3245
Intel Celeron J3355E
Celeron J3355E

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 5 votes

Rate Xeon W-3245 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Celeron J3355E on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon W-3245 and Celeron J3355E, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.