Xeon Gold 6137 vs W-3235

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-3235
2019, $1,398
12 cores / 24 threads, 180 Watt
14.48
+31.9%

Xeon W-3235 outperforms Xeon Gold 6137 by a substantial 32% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking544801
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.27no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Wno data
Power efficiency3.422.28
DesignerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)no data
Release date3 June 2019 (6 years ago)1 July 2017 (8 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,398no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3235 and Xeon Gold 6137 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads2416
Base clock speed3.3 GHz3.9 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz4.1 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier33no data
L1 cache768 KBno data
L2 cache12 MBno data
L3 cache19.25 MB25 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature72 °Cno data
64 bit support+-
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3235 and Xeon Gold 6137 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt205 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3235 and Xeon Gold 6137. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX+-
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+-
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon W-3235 and Xeon Gold 6137 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3235 and Xeon Gold 6137 are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3235 and Xeon Gold 6137. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR4-2666
Maximum memory size1 TB768 GB
Max memory channels66
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3235 and Xeon Gold 6137.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes6448

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon W-3235 14.48
+31.9%
Xeon Gold 6137 10.98

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon W-3235 25539
+31.9%
Samples: 54
Xeon Gold 6137 19365
Samples: 2

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.48 10.98
Recency 3 June 2019 1 July 2017
Physical cores 12 8
Threads 24 16
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 205 Watt

Xeon W-3235 has a 31.9% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads, and 13.9% lower power consumption.

The Intel Xeon W-3235 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon Gold 6137 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3235
Xeon W-3235
Intel Xeon Gold 6137
Xeon Gold 6137

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 22 votes

Rate Xeon W-3235 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 2 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6137 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon W-3235 and Xeon Gold 6137, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.