Xeon E7-8890 v4 vs W-3235

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-3235
2019
12 cores / 24 threads, 180 Watt
14.45
+1146%

Xeon W-3235 outperforms Xeon E7-8890 v4 by a whopping 1146% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking5412543
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.30no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon WIntel Xeon E7
Power efficiency3.420.30
DesignerIntelIntel
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Broadwell (2015−2019)
Release date3 June 2019 (6 years ago)20 June 2016 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,398$7,174

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon W-3235 and Xeon E7-8890 v4 have a nearly equal value for money.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3235 and Xeon E7-8890 v4 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads2448
Base clock speed3.3 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0QPI
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s3 × 9.6 GT/s
Multiplier33no data
L1 cache768 KBno data
L2 cache12 MB6 MB
L3 cache19.25 MB60 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature72 °C79 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3235 and Xeon E7-8890 v4 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)8 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA2011
Power consumption (TDP)180 Watt165 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3235 and Xeon E7-8890 v4. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
Flex Memory Accessno data-
Demand Based Switchingno data-
PAEno data46 Bit
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon W-3235 and Xeon E7-8890 v4 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3235 and Xeon E7-8890 v4 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3235 and Xeon E7-8890 v4. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR4-1333, DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333, DDR3-1600
Maximum memory size1 TB3 TB
Max memory channels64
Maximum memory bandwidth140.8 GB/s85 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3235 and Xeon E7-8890 v4.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes6432

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon W-3235 14.45
+1146%
Xeon E7-8890 v4 1.16

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon W-3235 25539
+1143%
Samples: 54
Xeon E7-8890 v4 2054

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.45 1.16
Recency 3 June 2019 20 June 2016
Physical cores 12 24
Threads 24 48
Power consumption (TDP) 180 Watt 165 Watt

Xeon W-3235 has a 1145.7% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 2 years.

Xeon E7-8890 v4, on the other hand, has 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and 9.1% lower power consumption.

The Intel Xeon W-3235 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon E7-8890 v4 in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3235
Xeon W-3235
Intel Xeon E7-8890 v4
Xeon E7-8890 v4

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 22 votes

Rate Xeon W-3235 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.2 33 votes

Rate Xeon E7-8890 v4 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon W-3235 and Xeon E7-8890 v4, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.