3015e vs Xeon W-3225

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-3225
2019, $1,199
8 cores / 16 threads, 160 Watt
10.43
+595%

Xeon W-3225 outperforms 3015e by a whopping 595% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking8952393
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.75no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon WAMD Raven Ridge (Ryzen 2000 APU)
Power efficiency2.7510.55
DesignerIntelAMD
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Pollock (Zen) (2020)
Release date3 June 2019 (6 years ago)4 August 2020 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,199no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3225 and 3015e basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)2 (Dual-core)
Threads164
Base clock speed3.7 GHz1.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.4 GHz2.3 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier37no data
L1 cache512 KB192 KB
L2 cache8 MB1 MB
L3 cache16.5 MB4 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature68 °C105 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3225 and 3015e compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketFCLGA3647FT5
Power consumption (TDP)160 Watt6 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3225 and 3015e. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon W-3225 and 3015e technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3225 and 3015e are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3225 and 3015e. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4
Maximum memory size1 TBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon RX Vega 3 ( - 600 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3225 and 3015e.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes64no data

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon W-3225 10.43
+595%
3015e 1.50

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon W-3225 18251
+595%
Samples: 3
3015e 2627
Samples: 66

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.43 1.50
Recency 3 June 2019 4 August 2020
Physical cores 8 2
Threads 16 4
Power consumption (TDP) 160 Watt 6 Watt

Xeon W-3225 has a 595% higher aggregate performance score, and 300% more physical cores and 300% more threads.

3015e, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 2567% lower power consumption.

The Intel Xeon W-3225 is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD 3015e in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon W-3225 is a server/workstation processor while 3015e is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon W-3225 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 43 votes

Rate 3015e on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon W-3225 and 3015e, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.