Ryzen 9 7840HX vs Xeon W-3223

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking877not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.76no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Xeon WAMD Dragon Range (Zen 4, Ryzen 7045)
Power efficiency2.55no data
DesignerIntelAMD
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Dragon Range-HX (Zen 4) (2023−2024)
Release date3 June 2019 (6 years ago)17 January 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$749no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3223 and Ryzen 9 7840HX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads1624
Base clock speed3.5 GHz2.9 GHz
Boost clock speed4.2 GHz5.1 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier35no data
L1 cache512 KB768 KB
L2 cache8 MB12 MB
L3 cache16.5 MB64 MB
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm
Maximum core temperature68 °C100 °C
Number of transistorsno data9900 Million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3223 and Ryzen 9 7840HX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketFCLGA3647FL1
Power consumption (TDP)160 Watt55 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3223 and Ryzen 9 7840HX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AVX-512MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, AVX-512, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon W-3223 and Ryzen 9 7840HX technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3223 and Ryzen 9 7840HX are enumerated here.

VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3223 and Ryzen 9 7840HX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR5
Maximum memory size1 TBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataAMD Radeon 610M (400 - 2200 MHz)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3223 and Ryzen 9 7840HX.

PCIe version3.0no data
PCI Express lanes64no data

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 June 2019 17 January 2024
Physical cores 8 12
Threads 16 24
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 160 Watt 55 Watt

Ryzen 9 7840HX has an age advantage of 4 years, 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads, a 180% more advanced lithography process, and 190.9% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between Intel Xeon W-3223 and AMD Ryzen 9 7840HX. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that Xeon W-3223 is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 9 7840HX is a notebook one.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3223
Xeon W-3223
AMD Ryzen 9 7840HX
Ryzen 9 7840HX

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 6 votes

Rate Xeon W-3223 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 21 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 7840HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon W-3223 and Ryzen 9 7840HX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.