Xeon D-1736NT vs W-3175X

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-3175X
2018
28 cores / 56 threads, 255 Watt
26.15
+159%

Xeon W-3175X outperforms Xeon D-1736NT by a whopping 159% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking212838
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation4.98no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Wno data
Power efficiency4.356.39
DesignerIntelIntel
ManufacturerIntelno data
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)no data
Release date19 December 2018 (6 years ago)1 January 2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,999no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3175X and Xeon D-1736NT basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores28 (Octacosa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Performance-coresno data8
Threads5616
Base clock speed3.1 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz3.5 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier31no data
L1 cache64K (per core)no data
L2 cache1 MB (per core)no data
L3 cache38.5 MB (shared)15 MB
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Maximum core temperature85 °Cno data
Number of transistors8,000 millionno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3175X and Xeon D-1736NT compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)no data
SocketFCLGA3647FCBGA2227
Power consumption (TDP)255 Watt67 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3175X and Xeon D-1736NT. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX+-
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
QuickAssistno data+
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Thermal Monitoring-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon W-3175X and Xeon D-1736NT technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
SGXno dataYes with Intel® SPS

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3175X and Xeon D-1736NT are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3175X and Xeon D-1736NT. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4
Maximum memory size512 GB256 GB
Max memory channels62
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3175X and Xeon D-1736NT.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes4816
USB revisionno data3.0
Total number of SATA portsno data24
Number of USB portsno data4
Integrated LANno data+

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon W-3175X 26.15
+159%
Xeon D-1736NT 10.10

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon W-3175X 46125
+159%
Xeon D-1736NT 17826

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 26.15 10.10
Recency 19 December 2018 1 January 2022
Physical cores 28 8
Threads 56 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 255 Watt 67 Watt

Xeon W-3175X has a 158.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 250% more physical cores and 250% more threads.

Xeon D-1736NT, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 280.6% lower power consumption.

The Intel Xeon W-3175X is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon D-1736NT in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3175X
Xeon W-3175X
Intel Xeon D-1736NT
Xeon D-1736NT

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 119 votes

Rate Xeon W-3175X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon D-1736NT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon W-3175X and Xeon D-1736NT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.