EPYC 7262 vs Xeon W-3175X

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-3175X
2018
28 cores / 56 threads, 255 Watt
23.40
+78.9%
EPYC 7262
2019
8 cores / 16 threads, 155 Watt
13.08

Xeon W-3175X outperforms EPYC 7262 by an impressive 79% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-3175X and EPYC 7262 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking218571
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation12.759.64
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon WAMD EPYC
Power efficiency8.687.99
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Zen 2 (2017−2020)
Release date8 October 2018 (6 years ago)7 August 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,999$575

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon W-3175X has 32% better value for money than EPYC 7262.

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-3175X and EPYC 7262 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores28 (Octacosa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads5616
Base clock speed3.1 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.8 GHz3.4 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier3132
L1 cache1.75 MB512 KB
L2 cache28 MB4 MB
L3 cache38.5 MB (shared)128 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die sizeno data192 mm2
Maximum core temperature85 °Cno data
Number of transistors8,000 million3,800 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier+-

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-3175X and EPYC 7262 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCLGA3647SP3
Power consumption (TDP)255 Watt155 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-3175X and EPYC 7262. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon W-3175X and EPYC 7262 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-3175X and EPYC 7262 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-3175X and EPYC 7262. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2666DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size512 GB4 TiB
Max memory channels68
Maximum memory bandwidth128.001 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-3175X and EPYC 7262.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes48128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-3175X 23.40
+78.9%
EPYC 7262 13.08

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-3175X 37167
+78.9%
EPYC 7262 20779

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 23.40 13.08
Recency 8 October 2018 7 August 2019
Physical cores 28 8
Threads 56 16
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 255 Watt 155 Watt

Xeon W-3175X has a 78.9% higher aggregate performance score, and 250% more physical cores and 250% more threads.

EPYC 7262, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 months, a 100% more advanced lithography process, and 64.5% lower power consumption.

The Xeon W-3175X is our recommended choice as it beats the EPYC 7262 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-3175X and EPYC 7262, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-3175X
Xeon W-3175X
AMD EPYC 7262
EPYC 7262

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 119 votes

Rate Xeon W-3175X on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 21 vote

Rate EPYC 7262 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-3175X or EPYC 7262, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.