Xeon W-3265M vs W-2295
Aggregated performance score
W-3265M outperforms W-2295 by 4% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
General info
Comparing Xeon W-2295 and Xeon W-3265M processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 252 | 239 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Value for money | 11.14 | 3.09 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Series | no data | Intel Xeon W |
| Architecture codename | no data | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| Release date | 1 October 2019 (4 years ago) | 3 June 2019 (4 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $6,353 |
| Current price | $2292 | $7399 (1.2x MSRP) |
Value for money
Performance per price, higher is better.
Xeon W-2295 has 261% better value for money than Xeon W-3265M.
Technical specs
Xeon W-2295 and Xeon W-3265M basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 18 (Octadeca-Core) | 24 (Tetracosa-Core) |
| Threads | 36 | 48 |
| Base clock speed | 3 GHz | 2.7 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.8 GHz | 4.6 GHz |
| Bus support | no data | 4 × 8 GT/s |
| L1 cache | no data | 1.5 MB |
| L2 cache | no data | 24 MB |
| L3 cache | 24.75 MB | 33 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 61 °C | 78 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon W-2295 and Xeon W-3265M compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | FCLGA2066 | FCLGA3647 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 165 Watt | 205 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-2295 and Xeon W-3265M. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 | Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Speed Shift | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | + |
| TSX | + | + |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | + | no data |
| PAE | 46 Bit | no data |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | + | + |
| Status | Launched | Launched |
Security technologies
Xeon W-2295 and Xeon W-3265M technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
| EDB | + | + |
| Secure Key | + | no data |
| MPX | + | no data |
| Identity Protection | + | no data |
| SGX | - | no data |
| OS Guard | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-2295 and Xeon W-3265M are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-2295 and Xeon W-3265M. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2933 | DDR4-2933 |
| Maximum memory size | 1 TB | 2 TB |
| Max memory channels | 4 | 6 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 93.85 GB/s | 140.8 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-2295 and Xeon W-3265M.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 48 | 64 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
W-3265M outperforms W-2295 by 4% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
W-3265M outperforms W-2295 by 4% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
W-2295 outperforms W-3265M by 51% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
W-2295 outperforms W-3265M by 38% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Advantages and disadvantages
| Performance score | 19.87 | 20.71 |
| Recency | 1 October 2019 | 3 June 2019 |
| Physical cores | 18 | 24 |
| Threads | 36 | 48 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 165 Watt | 205 Watt |
We couldn't decide between Xeon W-2295 and Xeon W-3265M. The differences in performance seem too small.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-2295 and Xeon W-3265M, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
