FX-8350 vs Xeon W-2295

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-2295
2019
18 cores / 36 threads, 165 Watt
20.08
+418%

Xeon W-2295 outperforms FX-8350 by a whopping 418% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-2295 and FX-8350 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking2921472
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.78
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Seriesno dataAMD FX-Series (Desktop)
Power efficiency11.102.83
Architecture codenameno dataVishera (2012−2015)
Release date1 October 2019 (5 years ago)23 October 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-2295 and FX-8350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores18 (Octadeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads368
Base clock speed3 GHz4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.8 GHz4.2 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
L2 cacheno data8192 KB
L3 cache24.75 MBno data
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data315 mm2
Maximum core temperature61 °C61 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier-+
P0 Vcore voltageno dataMin: 1.2 V - Max: 1.4 V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-2295 and FX-8350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA2066AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)165 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-2295 and FX-8350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4a, AMD64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, CLMUL, CVT16, EVP, FMA4, XOP, Turbo Core, HT3.1
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX-+
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon W-2295 and FX-8350 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-2295 and FX-8350 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-2295 and FX-8350. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR3
Maximum memory size1 TBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth93.85 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-2295 and FX-8350.

PCIe version3.0n/a
PCI Express lanes48no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-2295 20.08
+418%
FX-8350 3.88

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-2295 30735
+418%
FX-8350 5936

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon W-2295 1524
+212%
FX-8350 488

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon W-2295 11012
+454%
FX-8350 1988

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.08 3.88
Recency 1 October 2019 23 October 2012
Physical cores 18 8
Threads 36 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 165 Watt 125 Watt

Xeon W-2295 has a 417.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, 125% more physical cores and 350% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

FX-8350, on the other hand, has 32% lower power consumption.

The Xeon W-2295 is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-8350 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon W-2295 is a server/workstation processor while FX-8350 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-2295 and FX-8350, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-2295
Xeon W-2295
AMD FX-8350
FX-8350

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 31 vote

Rate Xeon W-2295 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 3669 votes

Rate FX-8350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-2295 or FX-8350, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.