Core i7-9800X vs Xeon W-2295
Aggregate performance score
Xeon W-2295 outperforms i7-9800X by an impressive 70% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Xeon W-2295 and Core i7-9800X processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 272 | 646 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 24.17 | 43.45 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Series | no data | Intel Core i7 |
| Architecture codename | no data | Skylake (server) (2017−2019) |
| Release date | 1 October 2019 (4 years ago) | 8 October 2018 (5 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $589 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
i7-9800X has 80% better value for money than Xeon W-2295.
Detailed specifications
Xeon W-2295 and Core i7-9800X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | no data | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | no data | 16 |
| Base clock speed | no data | 3.8 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | no data | 3.8 GHz |
| Bus support | no data | 4 × 8 GT/s |
| L1 cache | no data | 512 KB |
| L2 cache | no data | 8 MB |
| L3 cache | no data | 16.5 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | no data | 14 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 61 °C | no data |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 72 °C |
| 64 bit support | - | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | Yes |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon W-2295 and Core i7-9800X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | no data | 2066 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 165 Watt | 165 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-2295 and Core i7-9800X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | no data | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | no data | + |
| TSX | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-2295 and Core i7-9800X are enumerated here.
| VT-d | no data | + |
| VT-x | no data | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-2295 and Core i7-9800X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | no data | DDR4 Quad-channel |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 128 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 4 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 93.85 GB/s | 85.33 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-2295 and Core i7-9800X.
| PCIe version | no data | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 48 | 44 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Xeon W-2295 outperforms Core i7-9800X by 70% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 65%
Xeon W-2295 outperforms Core i7-9800X by 70% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 40%
Xeon W-2295 outperforms Core i7-9800X by 10% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 40%
Xeon W-2295 outperforms Core i7-9800X by 43% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 19.81 | 11.68 |
| Recency | 1 October 2019 | 8 October 2018 |
Xeon W-2295 has a 69.6% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 11 months.
The Xeon W-2295 is our recommended choice as it beats the Core i7-9800X in performance tests.
Be aware that Xeon W-2295 is a server/workstation processor while Core i7-9800X is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-2295 and Core i7-9800X, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
