Xeon Silver 4112 vs W-2225
Aggregate performance score
W-2225 outperforms Silver 4112 by an impressive 64% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Xeon W-2225 and Xeon Silver 4112 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 946 | 1308 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 15.72 | 4.95 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Series | no data | Intel Xeon Silver |
| Architecture codename | no data | Skylake (server) (2017−2019) |
| Release date | 1 October 2019 (4 years ago) | 11 July 2017 (6 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $473 |
| Current price | $402 | $295 (0.6x MSRP) |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Xeon W-2225 has 218% better value for money than Xeon Silver 4112.
Detailed specifications
Xeon W-2225 and Xeon Silver 4112 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 8 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 4.1 GHz | 2.6 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.6 GHz | 3 GHz |
| L1 cache | no data | 256 KB |
| L2 cache | no data | 4 MB |
| L3 cache | 8.25 MB | 8.25 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 14 nm |
| Maximum core temperature | 61 °C | 76 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | No |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon W-2225 and Xeon Silver 4112 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 2 (Multiprocessor) |
| Socket | FCLGA2066 | FCLGA3647 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 105 Watt | 85 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-2225 and Xeon Silver 4112. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | no data | + |
| vPro | no data | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Speed Shift | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | + |
| TSX | + | + |
| Idle States | + | no data |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | no data |
| Flex Memory Access | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | + | no data |
| PAE | 46 Bit | no data |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | - | - |
| Status | Launched | Discontinued |
Security technologies
Xeon W-2225 and Xeon Silver 4112 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
| EDB | + | + |
| Secure Key | + | no data |
| MPX | + | no data |
| Identity Protection | + | no data |
| SGX | - | no data |
| OS Guard | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-2225 and Xeon Silver 4112 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-2225 and Xeon Silver 4112. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2933 | DDR4-2400 |
| Maximum memory size | 1 TB | 768 GB |
| Max memory channels | 4 | 6 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 93.85 GB/s | 115.212 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | + |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-2225 and Xeon Silver 4112.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 48 | 48 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
W-2225 outperforms Silver 4112 by 64% based on our aggregated benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
W-2225 outperforms Silver 4112 by 64% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
W-2225 outperforms Silver 4112 by 52% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
W-2225 outperforms Silver 4112 by 50% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 6.77 | 4.13 |
| Recency | 1 October 2019 | 11 July 2017 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 105 Watt | 85 Watt |
The Xeon W-2225 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Silver 4112 in performance tests.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-2225 and Xeon Silver 4112, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
