FX-8350 vs Xeon W-2195

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-2195
2017
18 cores / 36 threads, 140 Watt
17.97
+372%
FX-8350
2012
8 cores / 8 threads, 125 Watt
3.81

Xeon W-2195 outperforms FX-8350 by a whopping 372% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-2195 and FX-8350 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3481474
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.040.77
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon WAMD FX-Series (Desktop)
Power efficiency11.922.83
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Vishera (2012−2015)
Release date29 August 2017 (7 years ago)23 October 2012 (12 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$2,553$199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon W-2195 has 814% better value for money than FX-8350.

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-2195 and FX-8350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores18 (Octadeca-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads368
Base clock speed2.3 GHz4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz4.2 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier23no data
L1 cache1.125 MBno data
L2 cache18 MB8192 KB
L3 cache24.75 MB (shared)no data
Chip lithography14 nm32 nm
Die sizeno data315 mm2
Maximum core temperature66 °C61 °C
Number of transistorsno data1,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+-
Unlocked multiplier-+
P0 Vcore voltageno dataMin: 1.2 V - Max: 1.4 V

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-2195 and FX-8350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)1
SocketSocket R4AM3+
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-2195 and FX-8350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4a, AMD64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, CLMUL, CVT16, EVP, FMA4, XOP, Turbo Core, HT3.1
AES-NI++
FMA-+
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data

Security technologies

Xeon W-2195 and FX-8350 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-2195 and FX-8350 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-2195 and FX-8350. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400, DDR4-2666DDR3
Maximum memory size512 GBno data
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataOn certain motherboards (Chipset feature)

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-2195 and FX-8350.

PCIe version3.0n/a
PCI Express lanes48no data

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-2195 17.97
+372%
FX-8350 3.81

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-2195 28005
+372%
FX-8350 5936

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon W-2195 1328
+172%
FX-8350 488

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon W-2195 9732
+390%
FX-8350 1988

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 17.97 3.81
Recency 29 August 2017 23 October 2012
Physical cores 18 8
Threads 36 8
Chip lithography 14 nm 32 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 125 Watt

Xeon W-2195 has a 371.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 125% more physical cores and 350% more threads, and a 128.6% more advanced lithography process.

FX-8350, on the other hand, has 12% lower power consumption.

The Xeon W-2195 is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-8350 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon W-2195 is a server/workstation processor while FX-8350 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-2195 and FX-8350, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-2195
Xeon W-2195
AMD FX-8350
FX-8350

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 30 votes

Rate Xeon W-2195 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 3672 votes

Rate FX-8350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-2195 or FX-8350, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.