Xeon Gold 6338N vs W-2175

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-2175
2017
14 cores / 28 threads, 140 Watt
15.24
Xeon Gold 6338N
2021
32 cores / 64 threads, 185 Watt
27.50
+80.4%

Xeon Gold 6338N outperforms Xeon W-2175 by an impressive 80% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-2175 and Xeon Gold 6338N processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking478181
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.79no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Wno data
Power efficiency9.9313.55
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Ice Lake-SP (2021)
Release date29 August 2017 (7 years ago)6 April 2021 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,947no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-2175 and Xeon Gold 6338N basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores14 (Tetradeca-Core)32 (Dotriaconta-Core)
Threads2864
Base clock speed2.5 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed4.3 GHz3.5 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier25no data
L1 cache896 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache14 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache19.25 MB (shared)48 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm10 nm
Die size484 mm2no data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)66 °C83 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-2175 and Xeon Gold 6338N compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketFCLGA2066FCLGA4189
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt185 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-2175 and Xeon Gold 6338N. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon W-2175 and Xeon Gold 6338N technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGX-Yes with Intel® SPS
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-2175 and Xeon Gold 6338N are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-2175 and Xeon Gold 6338N. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400, DDR4-2666DDR4-2667
Maximum memory size512 GB6 TB
Max memory channels48
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/sno data
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-2175 and Xeon Gold 6338N.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes4864

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-2175 15.24
Xeon Gold 6338N 27.50
+80.4%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-2175 23316
Xeon Gold 6338N 42086
+80.5%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 15.24 27.50
Recency 29 August 2017 6 April 2021
Physical cores 14 32
Threads 28 64
Chip lithography 14 nm 10 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 185 Watt

Xeon W-2175 has 32.1% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 6338N, on the other hand, has a 80.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, 128.6% more physical cores and 128.6% more threads, and a 40% more advanced lithography process.

The Xeon Gold 6338N is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W-2175 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-2175 and Xeon Gold 6338N, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-2175
Xeon W-2175
Intel Xeon Gold 6338N
Xeon Gold 6338N

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.5 11 votes

Rate Xeon W-2175 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 3 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6338N on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-2175 or Xeon Gold 6338N, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.