Xeon Gold 6226 vs W-2155

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-2155
2017
10 cores / 20 threads, 140 Watt
13.26
+3.1%
Xeon Gold 6226
2019
12 cores / 24 threads, 125 Watt
12.86

Xeon W-2155 outperforms Xeon Gold 6226 by a minimal 3% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-2155 and Xeon Gold 6226 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking559589
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.529.72
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon WIntel Xeon Gold
Power efficiency8.969.74
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release date29 August 2017 (7 years ago)2 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,440$1,776

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Gold 6226 has 29% better value for money than Xeon W-2155.

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-2155 and Xeon Gold 6226 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads2024
Base clock speed3.3 GHz2.7 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0DMI 3.0
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier3327
L1 cache640 KB768 KB
L2 cache10 MB12 MB
L3 cache13.75 MB (shared)19.25 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size484 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data86 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)68 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-2155 and Xeon Gold 6226 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)4 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2066FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-2155 and Xeon Gold 6226. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0--
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon W-2155 and Xeon Gold 6226 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-2155 and Xeon Gold 6226 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-2155 and Xeon Gold 6226. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400, DDR4-2666DDR4-2933
Maximum memory size512 GB1 TB
Max memory channels46
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/s140.8 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-2155 and Xeon Gold 6226.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4848

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-2155 13.26
+3.1%
Xeon Gold 6226 12.86

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-2155 21070
+3.1%
Xeon Gold 6226 20429

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 13.26 12.86
Recency 29 August 2017 2 April 2019
Physical cores 10 12
Threads 20 24
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 125 Watt

Xeon W-2155 has a 3.1% higher aggregate performance score.

Xeon Gold 6226, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, 20% more physical cores and 20% more threads, and 12% lower power consumption.

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon W-2155 and Xeon Gold 6226.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-2155 and Xeon Gold 6226, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-2155
Xeon W-2155
Intel Xeon Gold 6226
Xeon Gold 6226

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.9 19 votes

Rate Xeon W-2155 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 5 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6226 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-2155 or Xeon Gold 6226, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.