FX-8350 vs Xeon W-2140B
Aggregate performance score
Xeon W-2140B outperforms FX-8350 by a whopping 191% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Xeon W-2140B and FX-8350 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in performance ranking | 653 | 1390 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 1.13 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Xeon W | AMD FX-Series (Desktop) |
| Architecture codename | Skylake (server) (2017−2019) | Vishera (2012−2015) |
| Release date | 21 December 2017 (6 years ago) | 23 October 2012 (11 years ago) |
| Current price | no data | $162 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Xeon W-2140B and FX-8350 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 8 |
| Base clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.2 GHz | 4.2 GHz |
| Bus support | 4 × 8 GT/s | no data |
| L1 cache | 64K (per core) | no data |
| L2 cache | 1 MB (per core) | 8192 KB |
| L3 cache | 11 MB (shared) | no data |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 32 nm |
| Die size | 484 mm2 | 315 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 61 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 70 °C | no data |
| Number of transistors | no data | 1,200 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | - | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | No | Yes |
| P0 Vcore voltage | no data | Min: 1.2 V - Max: 1.4 V |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon W-2140B and FX-8350 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | 2066 | AM3+ |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 125 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-2140B and FX-8350. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4a, AMD64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, CLMUL, CVT16, EVP, FMA4, XOP, Turbo Core, HT3.1 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| FMA | no data | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| TSX | + | no data |
Security technologies
Xeon W-2140B and FX-8350 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-2140B and FX-8350 are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | no data | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-2140B and FX-8350. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-2666 | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | 512 GB | no data |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 85.33 GB/s | no data |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-2140B and FX-8350.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | n/a |
| PCI Express lanes | 48 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Xeon W-2140B outperforms FX-8350 by 191% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Benchmark coverage: 68%
Xeon W-2140B outperforms FX-8350 by 191% in Passmark.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Xeon W-2140B outperforms FX-8350 by 169% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Benchmark coverage: 42%
Xeon W-2140B outperforms FX-8350 by 280% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 11.19 | 3.84 |
| Recency | 21 December 2017 | 23 October 2012 |
| Threads | 16 | 8 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 32 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 125 Watt |
The Xeon W-2140B is our recommended choice as it beats the FX-8350 in performance tests.
Be aware that Xeon W-2140B is a server/workstation processor while FX-8350 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-2140B and FX-8350, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
