Xeon Gold 5222 vs W-2133

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-2133
2017
6 cores / 12 threads, 140 Watt
7.97
+33.5%
Xeon Gold 5222
2019
4 cores / 8 threads, 105 Watt
5.97

Xeon W-2133 outperforms Xeon Gold 5222 by a substantial 34% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-2133 and Xeon Gold 5222 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking9441108
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.264.98
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon WIntel Xeon Gold
Power efficiency5.395.38
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2018)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release date29 August 2017 (7 years ago)2 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$617$1,221

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon W-2133 has 46% better value for money than Xeon Gold 5222.

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-2133 and Xeon Gold 5222 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)4 (Quad-Core)
Threads128
Base clock speed3.6 GHz3.8 GHz
Boost clock speed3.9 GHz3.9 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0DMI 3.0
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier3638
L1 cache64K (per core)256 KB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)4 MB
L3 cache8.25 MB (shared)16.5 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size484 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data72 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)65 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-2133 and Xeon Gold 5222 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)4 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2066FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)140 Watt105 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-2133 and Xeon Gold 5222. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0--
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon W-2133 and Xeon Gold 5222 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-2133 and Xeon Gold 5222 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-2133 and Xeon Gold 5222. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400, DDR4-2666DDR4-2933
Maximum memory size512 GB1 TB
Max memory channels46
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/s140.8 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-2133 and Xeon Gold 5222.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4848

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-2133 7.97
+33.5%
Xeon Gold 5222 5.97

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-2133 12657
+33.4%
Xeon Gold 5222 9489

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.97 5.97
Recency 29 August 2017 2 April 2019
Physical cores 6 4
Threads 12 8
Power consumption (TDP) 140 Watt 105 Watt

Xeon W-2133 has a 33.5% higher aggregate performance score, and 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

Xeon Gold 5222, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 1 year, and 33.3% lower power consumption.

The Xeon W-2133 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Gold 5222 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-2133 and Xeon Gold 5222, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-2133
Xeon W-2133
Intel Xeon Gold 5222
Xeon Gold 5222

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.1 34 votes

Rate Xeon W-2133 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 4 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 5222 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-2133 or Xeon Gold 5222, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.