EPYC 9654P vs Xeon W-2125

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-2125
2017
4 cores / 8 threads, 120 Watt
6.56
EPYC 9654P
2022
96 cores / 192 threads, 360 Watt
74.46
+1035%

EPYC 9654P outperforms Xeon W-2125 by a whopping 1035% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-2125 and EPYC 9654P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking10536
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation7.571.96
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon WAMD EPYC
Power efficiency4.9818.86
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Genoa (2022−2023)
Release date29 August 2017 (7 years ago)10 November 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$444$10,625

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon W-2125 has 286% better value for money than EPYC 9654P.

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-2125 and EPYC 9654P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)96
Threads8192
Base clock speed4 GHz2.4 GHz
Boost clock speed4.5 GHz2.4 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0no data
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/sno data
Multiplier4024
L1 cache64K (per core)6 MB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)96 MB
L3 cache8.25 MB (shared)384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die size484 mm212x 72 mm2
Maximum case temperature (TCase)64 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data78,840 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-2125 and EPYC 9654P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)2
SocketFCLGA2066SP5
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt360 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-2125 and EPYC 9654P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon W-2125 and EPYC 9654P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-2125 and EPYC 9654P are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-2125 and EPYC 9654P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400, DDR4-2666DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size512 GB6 TiB
Max memory channels4no data
Maximum memory bandwidth85.33 GB/s460.8 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-2125 and EPYC 9654P.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes48128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-2125 6.56
EPYC 9654P 74.46
+1035%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-2125 10038
EPYC 9654P 113949
+1035%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 6.56 74.46
Recency 29 August 2017 10 November 2022
Physical cores 4 96
Threads 8 192
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 360 Watt

Xeon W-2125 has 200% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9654P, on the other hand, has a 1035.1% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, 2300% more physical cores and 2300% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9654P is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W-2125 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-2125 and EPYC 9654P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-2125
Xeon W-2125
AMD EPYC 9654P
EPYC 9654P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 27 votes

Rate Xeon W-2125 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 9 votes

Rate EPYC 9654P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-2125 or EPYC 9654P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.