Xeon Gold 6240 vs W-2102

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-2102
2017
4 cores / 4 threads, 120 Watt
3.33
Xeon Gold 6240
2019
18 cores / 36 threads, 150 Watt
18.58
+458%

Xeon Gold 6240 outperforms Xeon W-2102 by a whopping 458% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-2102 and Xeon Gold 6240 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1579333
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.7411.77
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon WIntel Xeon Gold
Power efficiency2.5311.27
Architecture codenameSkylake (server) (2017−2019)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release date29 August 2017 (7 years ago)2 April 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$202$2,445

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Gold 6240 has 75% better value for money than Xeon W-2102.

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-2102 and Xeon Gold 6240 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores4 (Quad-Core)18 (Octadeca-Core)
Threads436
Base clock speed2.9 GHz2.6 GHz
Boost clock speed2.9 GHz3.9 GHz
Bus typeDMI 3.0DMI 3.0
Bus rate4 × 8 GT/s4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier2926
L1 cache64K (per core)1.125 MB
L2 cache1 MB (per core)18 MB
L3 cache8.25 MB (shared)24.75 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Die size484 mm2no data
Maximum core temperatureno data85 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)66 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-2102 and Xeon Gold 6240 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration1 (Uniprocessor)4 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCLGA2066FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)120 Watt150 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-2102 and Xeon Gold 6240. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology-2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology-+
TSX++
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access-no data
Demand Based Switching+no data
PAE46 Bitno data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0--
StatusLaunchedLaunched
Deep Learning Boost-+

Security technologies

Xeon W-2102 and Xeon Gold 6240 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key+no data
MPX+-
Identity Protection+-
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-2102 and Xeon Gold 6240 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-2102 and Xeon Gold 6240. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400DDR4-2933
Maximum memory size512 GB1 TB
Max memory channels46
Maximum memory bandwidth76.805 GB/s140.8 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-2102 and Xeon Gold 6240.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4848

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-2102 3.33
Xeon Gold 6240 18.58
+458%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-2102 5079
Xeon Gold 6240 28369
+459%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 3.33 18.58
Recency 29 August 2017 2 April 2019
Physical cores 4 18
Threads 4 36
Power consumption (TDP) 120 Watt 150 Watt

Xeon W-2102 has 25% lower power consumption.

Xeon Gold 6240, on the other hand, has a 458% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, and 350% more physical cores and 800% more threads.

The Xeon Gold 6240 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W-2102 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-2102 and Xeon Gold 6240, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-2102
Xeon W-2102
Intel Xeon Gold 6240
Xeon Gold 6240

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 5 votes

Rate Xeon W-2102 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 10 votes

Rate Xeon Gold 6240 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-2102 or Xeon Gold 6240, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.