i5-3470 vs Xeon W-2102
Aggregate performance score
Xeon W-2102 outperforms Core i5-3470 by a small 8% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Xeon W-2102 and Core i5-3470 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 1601 | 1645 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 15 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 6.08 | 0.49 |
| Market segment | Server | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Xeon W | Intel Core i5 (Desktop) |
| Power efficiency | 2.52 | 3.62 |
| Architecture codename | Skylake (server) (2017−2019) | Ivy Bridge (2012−2013) |
| Release date | 29 August 2017 (7 years ago) | 1 June 2012 (12 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $202 | $184 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Xeon W-2102 has 1141% better value for money than i5-3470.
Detailed specifications
Xeon W-2102 and Core i5-3470 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 4 (Quad-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 4 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2.9 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 2.9 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| Bus type | DMI 3.0 | no data |
| Bus rate | 4 × 8 GT/s | 5 GT/s |
| Multiplier | 29 | no data |
| L1 cache | 256 KB | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 4 MB | 256K (per core) |
| L3 cache | 8.25 MB (shared) | 6 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 22 nm |
| Die size | 484 mm2 | 132.8 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | no data | 67 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | 66 °C | 67 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon W-2102 and Core i5-3470 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 (Uniprocessor) | 1 |
| Socket | FCLGA2066 | FCLGA1155 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 77 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-2102 and Core i5-3470. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Speed Shift | + | no data |
| Turbo Boost Technology | - | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | - | - |
| TSX | + | - |
| Idle States | + | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | + |
| Flex Memory Access | - | no data |
| Demand Based Switching | + | no data |
| PAE | 46 Bit | no data |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | - | no data |
| FDI | no data | + |
Security technologies
Xeon W-2102 and Core i5-3470 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
| EDB | + | + |
| Secure Key | + | + |
| MPX | + | - |
| Identity Protection | + | + |
| SGX | - | no data |
| OS Guard | + | no data |
| Anti-Theft | no data | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-2102 and Core i5-3470 are enumerated here.
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-2102 and Core i5-3470. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133, DDR4-2400 | DDR3 |
| Maximum memory size | 512 GB | 32 GB |
| Max memory channels | 4 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 76.805 GB/s | 25.6 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | no data | Intel HD Graphics 2500 |
| Quick Sync Video | - | + |
| Clear Video HD | no data | + |
| Graphics max frequency | no data | 1.1 GHz |
| InTru 3D | no data | + |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Xeon W-2102 and Core i5-3470 integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | no data | 3 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-2102 and Core i5-3470.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 48 | no data |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 3.25 | 3.00 |
| Recency | 29 August 2017 | 1 June 2012 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 22 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 120 Watt | 77 Watt |
Xeon W-2102 has a 8.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 5 years, and a 57.1% more advanced lithography process.
i5-3470, on the other hand, has 55.8% lower power consumption.
Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon W-2102 and Core i5-3470.
Be aware that Xeon W-2102 is a server/workstation processor while Core i5-3470 is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-2102 and Core i5-3470, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
