Ultra 5 238V vs Xeon W-1390P
Aggregate performance score
Xeon W-1390P outperforms Core Ultra 5 238V by a moderate 13% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Xeon W-1390P and Core Ultra 5 238V processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
Place in the ranking | 426 | 525 |
Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 63.59 | no data |
Market segment | Server | Laptop |
Power efficiency | 12.03 | 78.16 |
Architecture codename | Rocket Lake-S (2021) | Lunar Lake (2024) |
Release date | 6 May 2021 (3 years ago) | 24 September 2024 (less than a year ago) |
Launch price (MSRP) | $539 | no data |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Xeon W-1390P and Core Ultra 5 238V basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 8 (Octa-Core) |
Performance-cores | no data | 4 |
Low Power Efficient-cores | no data | 4 |
Threads | 16 | 8 |
Base clock speed | 3.5 GHz | 2.1 GHz |
Boost clock speed | 5.2 GHz | 4.7 GHz |
Bus rate | 8 GT/s | 37 MHz |
L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 192 KB (per core) |
L2 cache | 512 KB (per core) | 2.5 MB (per core) |
L3 cache | 16 MB (shared) | 8 MB (shared) |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 3 nm |
Die size | 276 mm2 | no data |
Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 100 °C |
64 bit support | + | + |
Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon W-1390P and Core Ultra 5 238V compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
Socket | FCLGA1200 | FCBGA2833 |
Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 17 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-1390P and Core Ultra 5 238V. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
AES-NI | + | + |
AVX | + | + |
vPro | + | no data |
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
Speed Shift | no data | + |
Turbo Boost Technology | 2.0 | no data |
Hyper-Threading Technology | + | - |
TSX | + | + |
Idle States | + | no data |
Thermal Monitoring | + | + |
Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | + | - |
Deep Learning Boost | + | + |
Supported AI Software Frameworks | - | OpenVINO™, WindowsML, DirectML, ONNX RT, WebNN |
Security technologies
Xeon W-1390P and Core Ultra 5 238V technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
TXT | + | + |
EDB | + | + |
Secure Key | + | + |
Identity Protection | + | - |
SGX | - | no data |
OS Guard | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-1390P and Core Ultra 5 238V are enumerated here.
VT-d | + | + |
VT-x | + | + |
EPT | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-1390P and Core Ultra 5 238V. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
Supported memory types | DDR4-3200 | DDR5 |
Maximum memory size | 128 GB | 32 GB |
Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
Maximum memory bandwidth | 50 GB/s | no data |
ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
Integrated graphics card Compare | Intel UHD Graphics P750 | Intel Arc Graphics 130V |
Max video memory | 64 GB | no data |
Quick Sync Video | + | + |
Clear Video | + | no data |
Clear Video HD | + | no data |
Graphics max frequency | 1.3 GHz | 1.85 GHz |
Execution Units | 32 | no data |
InTru 3D | + | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Xeon W-1390P and Core Ultra 5 238V integrated GPUs.
Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon W-1390P and Core Ultra 5 238V integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
4K resolution support | + | no data |
Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2160@60Hz | 4096 x 2304 @ 60Hz (HDMI 2.1 TMDS) 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz (HDMI2.1 FRL) |
Max resolution over eDP | 5120 x 3200 @60Hz | 3840x2400 @ 120Hz |
Max resolution over DisplayPort | 5120 x 3200 @60Hz | 7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Xeon W-1390P and Core Ultra 5 238V integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6 |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-1390P and Core Ultra 5 238V.
PCIe version | 4.0 | 5.0 |
PCI Express lanes | 20 | 4 |
PCI support | no data | 5.0 and 4.0 |
Pros & cons summary
Performance score | 15.89 | 14.04 |
Integrated graphics card | 4.56 | 11.64 |
Recency | 6 May 2021 | 24 September 2024 |
Threads | 16 | 8 |
Chip lithography | 14 nm | 3 nm |
Power consumption (TDP) | 125 Watt | 17 Watt |
Xeon W-1390P has a 13.2% higher aggregate performance score, and 100% more threads.
Ultra 5 238V, on the other hand, has 155.3% faster integrated GPU, an age advantage of 3 years, a 366.7% more advanced lithography process, and 635.3% lower power consumption.
The Xeon W-1390P is our recommended choice as it beats the Core Ultra 5 238V in performance tests.
Be aware that Xeon W-1390P is a server/workstation processor while Core Ultra 5 238V is a notebook one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-1390P and Core Ultra 5 238V, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.