EPYC 9175F vs Xeon W-1350

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-1350 and EPYC 9175F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking643not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation94.43no data
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency14.16no data
Architecture codenameRocket Lake-S (2021)Turin (2024)
Release date6 May 2021 (3 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$255$4,256

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-1350 and EPYC 9175F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores6 (Hexa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads1232
Base clock speed3.3 GHz4.2 GHz
Boost clock speed5 GHz5 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
L1 cache80 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache512 KB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB (shared)512 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm4 nm
Die size276 mm216x 70.6 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data133,040 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-1350 and EPYC 9175F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCLGA1200SP5
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt320 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-1350 and EPYC 9175F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon W-1350 and EPYC 9175F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-1350 and EPYC 9175F are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-1350 and EPYC 9175F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-3200DDR5
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth50 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics P750N/A
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.3 GHzno data
Execution Units32no data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon W-1350 and EPYC 9175F integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon W-1350 and EPYC 9175F integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2160@60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP5120 x 3200 @60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort5120 x 3200 @60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon W-1350 and EPYC 9175F integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.1no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-1350 and EPYC 9175F.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes20128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 May 2021 10 October 2024
Physical cores 6 16
Threads 12 32
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 320 Watt

Xeon W-1350 has 300% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9175F, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, 166.7% more physical cores and 166.7% more threads, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Xeon W-1350 and EPYC 9175F. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-1350 and EPYC 9175F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-1350
Xeon W-1350
AMD EPYC 9175F
EPYC 9175F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 22 votes

Rate Xeon W-1350 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9175F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-1350 or EPYC 9175F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.