EPYC 8324PN vs Xeon W-1290TE
Aggregate performance score
Xeon W-1290TE outperforms EPYC 8324PN by an impressive 73% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 960 | 1327 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 22.71 | 1.49 |
| Market segment | Server | Server |
| Power efficiency | 9.97 | 1.55 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | Intel | TSMC |
| Architecture codename | Comet Lake (2020) | Siena (2023−2024) |
| Release date | 13 May 2020 (5 years ago) | 18 September 2023 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $552 | $2,125 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Xeon W-1290TE has 1424% better value for money than EPYC 8324PN.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Xeon W-1290TE and EPYC 8324PN basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 10 (Deca-Core) | 32 (Dotriaconta-Core) |
| Threads | 20 | 64 |
| Base clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 2.05 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.5 GHz | 3 GHz |
| L1 cache | 64 KB (per core) | 64 KB (per core) |
| L2 cache | 256 KB (per core) | 1 MB (per core) |
| L3 cache | 20 MB (shared) | 128 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 5 nm |
| Die size | 206 mm2 | 4x 73 mm2 |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 85 °C |
| Number of transistors | no data | 35,500 million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | no data |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon W-1290TE and EPYC 8324PN compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | 1200 | SP6 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 130 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-1290TE and EPYC 8324PN. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| Precision Boost 2 | no data | + |
Security technologies
Xeon W-1290TE and EPYC 8324PN technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-1290TE and EPYC 8324PN are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-1290TE and EPYC 8324PN. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR5 |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics P630 | N/A |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-1290TE and EPYC 8324PN.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 5.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 96 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 9.02 | 5.21 |
| Recency | 13 May 2020 | 18 September 2023 |
| Physical cores | 10 | 32 |
| Threads | 20 | 64 |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | 5 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 130 Watt |
Xeon W-1290TE has a 73.1% higher aggregate performance score, and 271.4% lower power consumption.
EPYC 8324PN, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 3 years, 220% more physical cores and 220% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.
The Intel Xeon W-1290TE is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD EPYC 8324PN in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
