EPYC 9825 vs Xeon W-1290P

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-1290P and EPYC 9825 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking515not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency10.69no data
Architecture codenameComet Lake (2020)Turin (2024)
Release date13 May 2020 (4 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$13,006

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-1290P and EPYC 9825 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)144
Threads20288
Base clock speed3.7 GHz2.2 GHz
Boost clock speed5.2 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
L1 cache64K (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache20 MB (shared)384 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm3 nm
Die size206 mm2no data
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)70 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-1290P and EPYC 9825 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCLGA1200SP5
Power consumption (TDP)125 Watt390 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-1290P and EPYC 9825. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon W-1290P and EPYC 9825 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-1290P and EPYC 9825 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-1290P and EPYC 9825. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR5
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth45.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics P630N/A
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.2 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon W-1290P and EPYC 9825 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon W-1290P and EPYC 9825 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2160@30Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon W-1290P and EPYC 9825 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-1290P and EPYC 9825.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes16128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 13 May 2020 10 October 2024
Physical cores 10 144
Threads 20 288
Chip lithography 14 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 125 Watt 390 Watt

Xeon W-1290P has 212% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9825, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 4 years, 1340% more physical cores and 1340% more threads, and a 366.7% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Xeon W-1290P and EPYC 9825. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-1290P and EPYC 9825, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-1290P
Xeon W-1290P
AMD EPYC 9825
EPYC 9825

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 20 votes

Rate Xeon W-1290P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9825 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-1290P or EPYC 9825, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.