Core i5-13400F vs Xeon W-1290

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-1290
2020
10 cores / 20 threads, 80 Watt
12.98
Core i5-13400F
2023
10 cores / 16 threads, 65 Watt
16.30
+25.6%

i5-13400F outperforms Xeon W-1290 by a significant 26% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-1290 and Core i5-13400F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking551377
Place by popularitynot in top-10069
Cost-effectiveness evaluation46.3719.19
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Architecture codenameComet Lake (2020)Raptor Lake-S
Release date13 May 2020 (4 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$196
Current price$345 $675 (3.4x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon W-1290 has 142% better value for money than i5-13400F.

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-1290 and Core i5-13400F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores10 (Deca-Core)10 (Deca-Core)
Threads2016
Base clock speed3.2 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz4.6 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache256K (per core)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache20 MB (shared)20 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die size206 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)70 °C72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-1290 and Core i5-13400F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCLGA1200FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)80 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-1290 and Core i5-13400F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shiftno data+
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX-+
Idle States++
Thermal Monitoring++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+-
StatusDiscontinuedLaunched

Security technologies

Xeon W-1290 and Core i5-13400F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Key++
Identity Protection+no data
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-1290 and Core i5-13400F are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-1290 and Core i5-13400F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2933DDR5, DDR4
Maximum memory size128 GB192 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth45.8 GB/s76.8 GB/s
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics P630no data
Max video memory64 GBno data
Quick Sync Video+no data
Clear Video+no data
Clear Video HD+no data
Graphics max frequency1.2 GHzno data
InTru 3D+no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon W-1290 and Core i5-13400F integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon W-1290 and Core i5-13400F integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2160@30Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon W-1290 and Core i5-13400F integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-1290 and Core i5-13400F.

PCIe version3.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-1290 12.98
i5-13400F 16.30
+25.6%

Core i5-13400F outperforms Xeon W-1290 by 26% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon W-1290 20071
i5-13400F 25212
+25.6%

Core i5-13400F outperforms Xeon W-1290 by 26% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon W-1290 1742
i5-13400F 2287
+31.3%

Core i5-13400F outperforms Xeon W-1290 by 31% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon W-1290 8810
i5-13400F 10772
+22.3%

Core i5-13400F outperforms Xeon W-1290 by 22% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.98 16.30
Recency 13 May 2020 4 January 2023
Threads 20 16
Power consumption (TDP) 80 Watt 65 Watt

The Core i5-13400F is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W-1290 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon W-1290 is a server/workstation processor while Core i5-13400F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-1290 and Core i5-13400F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-1290
Xeon W-1290
Intel Core i5-13400F
Core i5-13400F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.4 14 votes

Rate Xeon W-1290 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 2700 votes

Rate Core i5-13400F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-1290 or Core i5-13400F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.