Ryzen 9 7900 vs Xeon W-11955M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-11955M
2021
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
14.16
Ryzen 9 7900
2023
12 cores / 24 threads, 65 Watt
30.70
+117%

Ryzen 9 7900 outperforms Xeon W-11955M by a whopping 117% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-11955M and Ryzen 9 7900 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking516134
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation47.4965.57
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Tiger Lakeno data
Power efficiency38.2644.67
Architecture codenameTiger Lake-H (2021)Raphael (Zen4) (2022−2023)
Release date11 May 2021 (3 years ago)14 January 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$623$429

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Ryzen 9 7900 has 38% better value for money than Xeon W-11955M.

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-11955M and Ryzen 9 7900 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads1624
Base clock speed2.1 GHz3.7 GHz
Boost clock speed5 GHz5.4 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
L1 cache80 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache1.25 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache24 MB (shared)64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm SuperFin5 nm
Die size190 mm22x 71 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C95 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °C47 °C
Number of transistorsno data13,140 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-11955M and Ryzen 9 7900 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1787AM5
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-11955M and Ryzen 9 7900. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-5125 nm, 0.650 - 1.475V
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon W-11955M and Ryzen 9 7900 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
Secure Key+no data
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-11955M and Ryzen 9 7900 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-11955M and Ryzen 9 7900. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5-5200
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth51.2 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics for 11th Gen Intel ProcessorsAMD Radeon Graphics (Ryzen 7000) ( - 2200 MHz)
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency1.45 GHzno data
Execution Units32no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon W-11955M and Ryzen 9 7900 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported4no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon W-11955M and Ryzen 9 7900 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680x4320@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon W-11955M and Ryzen 9 7900 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-11955M and Ryzen 9 7900.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes2024

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-11955M 14.16
Ryzen 9 7900 30.70
+117%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-11955M 22493
Ryzen 9 7900 48766
+117%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon W-11955M 2063
Ryzen 9 7900 2859
+38.6%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon W-11955M 8920
Ryzen 9 7900 16833
+88.7%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Xeon W-11955M 1846
Ryzen 9 7900 4020
+118%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Xeon W-11955M 230
Ryzen 9 7900 315
+37%

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Xeon W-11955M 8.6
Ryzen 9 7900 21.5
+150%

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Xeon W-11955M 8815
Ryzen 9 7900 10154
+15.2%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Xeon W-11955M 9058
Ryzen 9 7900 17880
+97.4%

Blender(-)

Xeon W-11955M 276
+121%
Ryzen 9 7900 125

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Xeon W-11955M 1587
Ryzen 9 7900 2203
+38.9%

7-Zip Single

Xeon W-11955M 5222
Ryzen 9 7900 7936
+52%

7-Zip

Xeon W-11955M 47264
Ryzen 9 7900 112881
+139%

WebXPRT 3

Xeon W-11955M 271
Ryzen 9 7900 366
+35.1%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.16 30.70
Integrated graphics card 5.58 4.43
Recency 11 May 2021 14 January 2023
Physical cores 8 12
Threads 16 24
Chip lithography 10 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 65 Watt

Xeon W-11955M has 26% faster integrated GPU, and 85.7% lower power consumption.

Ryzen 9 7900, on the other hand, has a 116.8% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 50% more physical cores and 50% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The Ryzen 9 7900 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W-11955M in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon W-11955M is a server/workstation processor while Ryzen 9 7900 is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-11955M and Ryzen 9 7900, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-11955M
Xeon W-11955M
AMD Ryzen 9 7900
Ryzen 9 7900

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 24 votes

Rate Xeon W-11955M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 383 votes

Rate Ryzen 9 7900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-11955M or Ryzen 9 7900, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.