EPYC 9124 vs Xeon W-11955M

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-11955M
2021
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
14.16
EPYC 9124
2022
16 cores / 32 threads, 200 Watt
27.79
+96.3%

EPYC 9124 outperforms Xeon W-11955M by an impressive 96% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-11955M and EPYC 9124 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking516171
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation47.5622.54
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Tiger LakeAMD EPYC
Power efficiency38.3113.16
Architecture codenameTiger Lake-H (2021)Genoa (2022−2023)
Release date11 May 2021 (3 years ago)10 November 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$623$1,083

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon W-11955M has 111% better value for money than EPYC 9124.

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-11955M and EPYC 9124 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads1632
Base clock speed2.1 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed5 GHz3.7 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
Multiplierno data30
L1 cache80 KB (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache1.25 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache24 MB (shared)64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm SuperFin5 nm, 6 nm
Die size190 mm24x 72 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data26,280 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-11955M and EPYC 9124 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration12
SocketFCBGA1787SP5
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-11955M and EPYC 9124. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon W-11955M and EPYC 9124 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
Secure Key+no data
SGX-no data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-11955M and EPYC 9124 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-11955M and EPYC 9124. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size128 GB6 TiB
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s460.8 GB/s
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel UHD Graphics for 11th Gen Intel Processorsno data
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency1.45 GHzno data
Execution Units32no data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon W-11955M and EPYC 9124 integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported4no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon W-11955M and EPYC 9124 integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680x4320@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon W-11955M and EPYC 9124 integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.1no data
OpenGL4.6no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-11955M and EPYC 9124.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes20128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-11955M 14.16
EPYC 9124 27.79
+96.3%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-11955M 22493
EPYC 9124 44137
+96.2%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon W-11955M 2055
+11%
EPYC 9124 1851

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon W-11955M 8872
EPYC 9124 13075
+47.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.16 27.79
Recency 11 May 2021 10 November 2022
Physical cores 8 16
Threads 16 32
Chip lithography 10 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 200 Watt

Xeon W-11955M has 471.4% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9124, on the other hand, has a 96.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 1 year, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 9124 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W-11955M in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-11955M and EPYC 9124, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-11955M
Xeon W-11955M
AMD EPYC 9124
EPYC 9124

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 24 votes

Rate Xeon W-11955M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 6 votes

Rate EPYC 9124 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-11955M or EPYC 9124, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.