i9-14900K vs Xeon W-11955M

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-11955M
2021
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
14.21
Core i9-14900K
2023
24 cores / 32 threads, 125 Watt
37.86
+166%

Core i9-14900K outperforms Xeon W-11955M by a whopping 166% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-11955M and Core i9-14900K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking50581
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation48.3561.53
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Tiger Lakeno data
Power efficiency38.4228.66
Architecture codenameTiger Lake-H (2021)Raptor Lake-R (2023−2024)
Release date11 May 2021 (3 years ago)17 October 2023 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$623$589

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i9-14900K has 27% better value for money than Xeon W-11955M.

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-11955M and Core i9-14900K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads1632
Base clock speed2.1 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed5 GHz5.8 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
L1 cache80 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache1.25 MB (per core)2 MB (per core)
L3 cache24 MB (shared)36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm SuperFinIntel 7 nm
Die size190 mm2257 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-11955M and Core i9-14900K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1787FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt125 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-11955M and Core i9-14900K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technologyno data2.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0++
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Xeon W-11955M and Core i9-14900K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDBno data+
Secure Key++
SGX-no data
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-11955M and Core i9-14900K are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-11955M and Core i9-14900K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory size128 GB192 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s89.6 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® UHD Graphics for 11th Gen Intel® ProcessorsIntel UHD Graphics 770
Quick Sync Video++
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequency1.45 GHz1.65 GHz
Execution Units3232

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon W-11955M and Core i9-14900K integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported44

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon W-11955M and Core i9-14900K integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@60Hz4096 x 2160 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hz5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680x4320@60Hz7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon W-11955M and Core i9-14900K integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.112
OpenGL4.64.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-11955M and Core i9-14900K.

PCIe version4.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes2016

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-11955M 14.21
i9-14900K 37.86
+166%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-11955M 22574
i9-14900K 60144
+166%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon W-11955M 2056
i9-14900K 3080
+49.8%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon W-11955M 8885
i9-14900K 20678
+133%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Xeon W-11955M 1846
i9-14900K 6103
+231%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Xeon W-11955M 230
i9-14900K 325
+41.1%

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Xeon W-11955M 8.6
i9-14900K 26.7
+210%

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Xeon W-11955M 8815
i9-14900K 16108
+82.7%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Xeon W-11955M 9058
i9-14900K 25199
+178%

Blender(-)

Xeon W-11955M 276
+225%
i9-14900K 85

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Xeon W-11955M 1587
i9-14900K 2369
+49.3%

7-Zip Single

Xeon W-11955M 5222
i9-14900K 7932
+51.9%

7-Zip

Xeon W-11955M 47264
i9-14900K 145207
+207%

WebXPRT 3

Xeon W-11955M 271
i9-14900K 386
+42.4%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.21 37.86
Recency 11 May 2021 17 October 2023
Physical cores 8 24
Threads 16 32
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 125 Watt

Xeon W-11955M has 257.1% lower power consumption.

i9-14900K, on the other hand, has a 166.4% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and 200% more physical cores and 100% more threads.

The Core i9-14900K is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W-11955M in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon W-11955M is a server/workstation processor while Core i9-14900K is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-11955M and Core i9-14900K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-11955M
Xeon W-11955M
Intel Core i9-14900K
Core i9-14900K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 23 votes

Rate Xeon W-11955M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 1677 votes

Rate Core i9-14900K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-11955M or Core i9-14900K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.