i9-12950HX vs Xeon W-11955M

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-11955M
2021
8 cores / 16 threads, 35 Watt
14.21
Core i9-12950HX
2022
16 cores / 24 threads, 55 Watt
20.35
+43.2%

Core i9-12950HX outperforms Xeon W-11955M by a considerable 43% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-11955M and Core i9-12950HX processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking506270
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation48.29no data
Market segmentServerLaptop
SeriesIntel Tiger Lakeno data
Power efficiency38.4235.02
Architecture codenameTiger Lake-H (2021)Alder Lake-HX (2022)
Release date11 May 2021 (3 years ago)10 May 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$623no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-11955M and Core i9-12950HX basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads1624
Base clock speed2.1 GHz2.3 GHz
Boost clock speed5 GHz5 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
L1 cache80 KB (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache1.25 MB (per core)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache24 MB (shared)30 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm SuperFinIntel 7 nm
Die size190 mm2215 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)72 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-11955M and Core i9-12950HX compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1787FCBGA1964
Power consumption (TDP)35 Watt55 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-11955M and Core i9-12950HX. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
FMA+-
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Thermal Monitoring++
Flex Memory Access++
SIPP++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0++
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Xeon W-11955M and Core i9-12950HX technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDBno data+
Secure Key++
SGX-no data
OS Guard++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-11955M and Core i9-12950HX are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-11955M and Core i9-12950HX. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory size128 GB128 GB
Max memory channels22
Maximum memory bandwidth51.2 GB/s76.8 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® UHD Graphics for 11th Gen Intel® ProcessorsIntel® UHD Graphics for 12th Gen Intel® Processors
Quick Sync Video++
Graphics max frequency1.45 GHz1.55 GHz
Execution Units3232

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon W-11955M and Core i9-12950HX integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported44

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon W-11955M and Core i9-12950HX integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@60Hz4096 x 2160 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hz5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPort7680x4320@60Hz7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon W-11955M and Core i9-12950HX integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12.112.1
OpenGL4.64.6

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-11955M and Core i9-12950HX.

PCIe version4.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes2020

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-11955M 14.21
i9-12950HX 20.35
+43.2%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-11955M 22574
i9-12950HX 32323
+43.2%

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Xeon W-11955M 1846
i9-12950HX 3107
+68.3%

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Xeon W-11955M 230
i9-12950HX 274
+19.1%

Geekbench 5.5 Multi-Core

Xeon W-11955M 9058
i9-12950HX 15229
+68.1%

Blender(-)

Xeon W-11955M 276
+57.7%
i9-12950HX 175

Geekbench 5.5 Single-Core

Xeon W-11955M 1587
i9-12950HX 1886
+18.9%

7-Zip Single

Xeon W-11955M 5222
i9-12950HX 6197
+18.7%

7-Zip

Xeon W-11955M 47264
i9-12950HX 77003
+62.9%

WebXPRT 3

Xeon W-11955M 271
i9-12950HX 311
+14.8%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 14.21 20.35
Recency 11 May 2021 10 May 2022
Physical cores 8 16
Threads 16 24
Power consumption (TDP) 35 Watt 55 Watt

Xeon W-11955M has 57.1% lower power consumption.

i9-12950HX, on the other hand, has a 43.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 months, and 100% more physical cores and 50% more threads.

The Core i9-12950HX is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W-11955M in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon W-11955M is a server/workstation processor while Core i9-12950HX is a notebook one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-11955M and Core i9-12950HX, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-11955M
Xeon W-11955M
Intel Core i9-12950HX
Core i9-12950HX

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 23 votes

Rate Xeon W-11955M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 28 votes

Rate Core i9-12950HX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-11955M or Core i9-12950HX, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.