Ryzen 3 1300X vs Xeon W-11865MRE
Aggregate performance score
Xeon W-11865MRE outperforms Ryzen 3 1300X by a whopping 183% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 799 | 1593 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | 14.65 | 1.83 |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Desktop processor |
| Series | no data | AMD Ryzen 3 |
| Power efficiency | 34.03 | 6.48 |
| Designer | Intel | AMD |
| Manufacturer | Intel | GlobalFoundries |
| Architecture codename | Tiger Lake-H (2021) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| Release date | 26 August 2021 (4 years ago) | 27 July 2017 (8 years ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $480 | $129 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Xeon W-11865MRE has 701% better value for money than Ryzen 3 1300X.
Performance to price scatter graph
Detailed specifications
Xeon W-11865MRE and Ryzen 3 1300X basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 8 (Octa-Core) | 4 (Quad-Core) |
| Threads | 16 | 4 |
| Base clock speed | 2.1 GHz | 3.4 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.7 GHz | 3.5 GHz |
| Bus rate | no data | 4 × 8 GT/s |
| Multiplier | no data | 34 |
| L1 cache | 80 KB (per core) | 384 KB |
| L2 cache | 1.25 MB (per core) | 2 MB |
| L3 cache | 24 MB (shared) | 8 MB (shared) |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 14 nm |
| Die size | 190 mm2 | 213 mm2 |
| Number of transistors | no data | 4800 Million |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | - |
| Unlocked multiplier | - | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon W-11865MRE and Ryzen 3 1300X compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 (Uniprocessor) |
| Socket | Intel BGA 1787 | AM4 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-11865MRE and Ryzen 3 1300X. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | no data | XFR, FMA3, SSE 4.2, AVX2, SMT |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| vPro | + | no data |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | no data |
| SIPP | + | - |
Security technologies
Xeon W-11865MRE and Ryzen 3 1300X technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | no data |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-11865MRE and Ryzen 3 1300X are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | - | + |
| VT-d | + | no data |
| VT-x | + | no data |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-11865MRE and Ryzen 3 1300X. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR4 Dual-channel |
| Maximum memory size | no data | 64 GB |
| Max memory channels | no data | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | no data | 42.671 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | - | + |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel UHD Graphics 750 | - |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-11865MRE and Ryzen 3 1300X.
| PCIe version | 4.0 | 3.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 20 | 20 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 11.11 | 3.93 |
| Recency | 26 August 2021 | 27 July 2017 |
| Physical cores | 8 | 4 |
| Threads | 16 | 4 |
| Chip lithography | 10 nm | 14 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 35 Watt | 65 Watt |
Xeon W-11865MRE has a 182.7% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more physical cores and 300% more threads, a 40% more advanced lithography process, and 85.7% lower power consumption.
The Intel Xeon W-11865MRE is our recommended choice as it beats the AMD Ryzen 3 1300X in performance tests.
Be aware that Xeon W-11865MRE is a mobile workstation processor while Ryzen 3 1300X is a desktop one.
Other comparisons
We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.
