Ryzen 7 7735HS vs Xeon W-10885M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregated performance score

Xeon W-10885M
2020
8 cores / 16 threads
10.16

Ryzen 7 7735HS outperforms Xeon W-10885M by an impressive 54% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-10885M and Ryzen 7 7735HS processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking690395
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Market segmentMobile workstationLaptop
SeriesComet Lakeno data
Architecture codenameComet Lake-H (2020)Rembrandt-HS Refresh
Release date13 May 2020 (4 years ago)4 January 2023 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-10885M and Ryzen 7 7735HS basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1616
Base clock speed2.4 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz4.75 GHz
L1 cache512 KB64K (per core)
L2 cache2 MB512K (per core)
L3 cache16 MB16 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm6 nm
Die sizeno data208 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °C95 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-10885M and Ryzen 7 7735HS compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1440FP7
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt35 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-10885M and Ryzen 7 7735HS. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2DDR5-4800/LPDDR5-6400 RAM (incl. ECC), PCIe 4, MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4A, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, AVX, AVX2, BMI2, ABM, FMA, ADX, SMEP, SMAP, SMT, CPB, AES-NI, RDRAND, RDSEED, SHA, SME
AES-NI++
FMAno data+
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX-no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+no data
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP+no data
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
StatusDiscontinuedno data

Security technologies

Xeon W-10885M and Ryzen 7 7735HS technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+no data
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-10885M and Ryzen 7 7735HS are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-10885M and Ryzen 7 7735HS. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth45.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+no data

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardIntel® UHD Graphics for 10th Gen Intel® ProcessorsAMD Radeon 680M
Quick Sync Video+no data
Graphics max frequency1.25 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon W-10885M and Ryzen 7 7735HS integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+no data
HDMI+no data
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon W-10885M and Ryzen 7 7735HS integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@30Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon W-10885M and Ryzen 7 7735HS integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-10885M and Ryzen 7 7735HS.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes1620

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-10885M 10.16
Ryzen 7 7735HS 15.66
+54.1%

Ryzen 7 7735HS outperforms Xeon W-10885M by 54% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon W-10885M 15709
Ryzen 7 7735HS 24225
+54.2%

Ryzen 7 7735HS outperforms Xeon W-10885M by 54% in Passmark.

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon W-10885M 1565
Ryzen 7 7735HS 1962
+25.4%

Ryzen 7 7735HS outperforms Xeon W-10885M by 25% in GeekBench 5 Single-Core.

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Benchmark coverage: 42%

Xeon W-10885M 7072
Ryzen 7 7735HS 9267
+31%

Ryzen 7 7735HS outperforms Xeon W-10885M by 31% in GeekBench 5 Multi-Core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core

Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing benchmark for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses just one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorcycle.

Benchmark coverage: 20%

Xeon W-10885M 7865
+18.7%
Ryzen 7 7735HS 6625

Xeon W-10885M outperforms Ryzen 7 7735HS by 19% in Cinebench 10 32-bit single-core.

Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 10 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Xeon W-10885M 44583
+8.8%
Ryzen 7 7735HS 40977

Xeon W-10885M outperforms Ryzen 7 7735HS by 9% in Cinebench 10 32-bit multi-core.

3DMark06 CPU

3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 benchmark suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains two scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX package.

Benchmark coverage: 19%

Xeon W-10885M 13490
+1.4%
Ryzen 7 7735HS 13310

Xeon W-10885M outperforms Ryzen 7 7735HS by 1% in 3DMark06 CPU.

wPrime 32

wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of first 32 million integer numbers. Its result is measured in seconds, so that the less is benchmark result, the faster the processor.

Benchmark coverage: 18%

Xeon W-10885M 3.6
Ryzen 7 7735HS 3.54
+1.7%

Xeon W-10885M outperforms Ryzen 7 7735HS by 2% in wPrime 32.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 11.5 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version.

Benchmark coverage: 17%

Xeon W-10885M 18
Ryzen 7 7735HS 25
+39.6%

Ryzen 7 7735HS outperforms Xeon W-10885M by 40% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core

Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Xeon W-10885M 1640
Ryzen 7 7735HS 2174
+32.5%

Ryzen 7 7735HS outperforms Xeon W-10885M by 33% in Cinebench 15 64-bit multi-core.

Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R15 (standing for Release 15) is a benchmark made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a single processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 15%

Xeon W-10885M 210
Ryzen 7 7735HS 248
+18.1%

Ryzen 7 7735HS outperforms Xeon W-10885M by 18% in Cinebench 15 64-bit single-core.

Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core

Cinebench R11.5 is an old benchmark by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which use more modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources.

Benchmark coverage: 14%

Xeon W-10885M 2.35
Ryzen 7 7735HS 2.94
+25.1%

Ryzen 7 7735HS outperforms Xeon W-10885M by 25% in Cinebench 11.5 64-bit single-core.

TrueCrypt AES

TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of disk partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded performance tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Result is encryption speed in gigabytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Xeon W-10885M 10.3
Ryzen 7 7735HS 12.8
+23.8%

Ryzen 7 7735HS outperforms Xeon W-10885M by 24% in TrueCrypt AES.

WinRAR 4.0

WinRAR 4.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated data. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Xeon W-10885M 7180
+10.8%
Ryzen 7 7735HS 6478

Xeon W-10885M outperforms Ryzen 7 7735HS by 11% in WinRAR 4.0.

x264 encoding pass 1

x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 compression method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Pass 1 is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its result is measured in frames per second, which means how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Xeon W-10885M 237
Ryzen 7 7735HS 270
+14.1%

Ryzen 7 7735HS outperforms Xeon W-10885M by 14% in x264 encoding pass 1.

x264 encoding pass 2

x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the higher bit rate is used when it is needed more. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second.  

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Xeon W-10885M 100
Ryzen 7 7735HS 125
+25%

Ryzen 7 7735HS outperforms Xeon W-10885M by 25% in x264 encoding pass 2.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.16 15.66
Recency 13 May 2020 4 January 2023
Chip lithography 14 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 35 Watt

The Ryzen 7 7735HS is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W-10885M in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon W-10885M is a mobile workstation processor while Ryzen 7 7735HS is a mobile workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-10885M and Ryzen 7 7735HS, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-10885M
Xeon W-10885M
AMD Ryzen 7 7735HS
Ryzen 7 7735HS

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 38 votes

Rate Xeon W-10885M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 1099 votes

Rate Ryzen 7 7735HS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-10885M or Ryzen 7 7735HS, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.