EPYC 4564P vs Xeon W-10885M

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon W-10885M
2020
8 cores / 16 threads, 45 Watt
9.93
EPYC 4564P
2024
16 cores / 32 threads, 170 Watt
39.68
+300%

EPYC 4564P outperforms Xeon W-10885M by a whopping 300% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon W-10885M and EPYC 4564P processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking78166
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data57.23
Market segmentMobile workstationServer
SeriesComet Lakeno data
Power efficiency20.8822.09
Architecture codenameComet Lake-H (2020)Raphael (2023−2024)
Release date13 May 2020 (4 years ago)21 May 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$699

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon W-10885M and EPYC 4564P basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads1632
Base clock speed2.4 GHz4.5 GHz
Boost clock speed5.1 GHz5.7 GHz
Bus rate8 GT/sno data
L1 cache512 KB64 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache16 MB64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm5 nm
Die sizeno data2x 71 mm2
Maximum core temperature100 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data47 °C
Number of transistorsno data13,140 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon W-10885M and EPYC 4564P compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration11
SocketFCBGA1440AM5
Power consumption (TDP)45 Watt170 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-10885M and EPYC 4564P. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
Idle States+no data
Thermal Monitoring+-
Flex Memory Access+no data
SIPP+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0+no data
Precision Boost 2no data+

Security technologies

Xeon W-10885M and EPYC 4564P technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
Secure Key+no data
Identity Protection+-
SGXYes with Intel® MEno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-10885M and EPYC 4564P are enumerated here.

AMD-V++
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-10885M and EPYC 4564P. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4DDR5
Maximum memory size128 GBno data
Max memory channels2no data
Maximum memory bandwidth45.8 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics card
Compare
Intel UHD Graphics for 10th Gen Intel ProcessorsAMD Radeon Graphics
Quick Sync Video+-
Graphics max frequency1.25 GHzno data

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon W-10885M and EPYC 4564P integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supported3no data
eDP+no data
DisplayPort+-
HDMI+-
DVI+no data

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon W-10885M and EPYC 4564P integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

4K resolution support+no data
Max resolution over HDMI 1.44096x2304@30Hzno data
Max resolution over eDP4096x2304@60Hzno data
Max resolution over DisplayPort4096x2304@60Hzno data

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon W-10885M and EPYC 4564P integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectX12no data
OpenGL4.5no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-10885M and EPYC 4564P.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes1628

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon W-10885M 9.93
EPYC 4564P 39.68
+300%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon W-10885M 15776
EPYC 4564P 63036
+300%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 9.93 39.68
Integrated graphics card 5.58 1.98
Recency 13 May 2020 21 May 2024
Physical cores 8 16
Threads 16 32
Chip lithography 14 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 45 Watt 170 Watt

Xeon W-10885M has 181.8% faster integrated GPU, and 277.8% lower power consumption.

EPYC 4564P, on the other hand, has a 299.6% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 years, 100% more physical cores and 100% more threads, and a 180% more advanced lithography process.

The EPYC 4564P is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W-10885M in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon W-10885M is a mobile workstation processor while EPYC 4564P is a server/workstation one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-10885M and EPYC 4564P, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon W-10885M
Xeon W-10885M
AMD EPYC 4564P
EPYC 4564P

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


4.3 45 votes

Rate Xeon W-10885M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.5 2 votes

Rate EPYC 4564P on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon W-10885M or EPYC 4564P, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.