i5-13400F vs Xeon W-10855M
Aggregate performance score
i5-13400F outperforms Xeon W-10855M by a whopping 100% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Primary details
Comparing Xeon W-10855M and Core i5-13400F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.
| Place in the ranking | 917 | 411 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | 42 |
| Cost-effectiveness evaluation | no data | 57.76 |
| Market segment | Mobile workstation | Desktop processor |
| Series | Intel Comet Lake | no data |
| Architecture codename | Comet Lake-H (2020) | Raptor Lake-S (2023−2024) |
| Release date | 13 May 2020 (4 years ago) | 4 January 2023 (1 year ago) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | no data | $196 |
Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Performance per price, higher is better.
Detailed specifications
Xeon W-10855M and Core i5-13400F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.
| Physical cores | 6 (Hexa-Core) | 10 (Deca-Core) |
| Threads | 12 | 16 |
| Base clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 2.5 GHz |
| Boost clock speed | 4.9 GHz | 4.6 GHz |
| Bus rate | 8 GT/s | no data |
| L1 cache | 384 KB | 0.1 MB |
| L2 cache | 1.5 MB | 9.5 MB |
| L3 cache | 12 MB | 20 MB |
| Chip lithography | 14 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Die size | no data | 257 mm2 |
| Maximum core temperature | 100 °C | 100 °C |
| Maximum case temperature (TCase) | no data | 72 °C |
| 64 bit support | + | + |
| Windows 11 compatibility | + | + |
Compatibility
Information on Xeon W-10855M and Core i5-13400F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.
| Number of CPUs in a configuration | 1 | 1 |
| Socket | FCBGA1440 | FCLGA1700 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 65 Watt |
Technologies and extensions
Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon W-10855M and Core i5-13400F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.
| Instruction set extensions | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 | Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 |
| AES-NI | + | + |
| AVX | + | + |
| Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) | + | + |
| Speed Shift | + | + |
| Turbo Boost Technology | no data | 2.0 |
| Hyper-Threading Technology | + | + |
| TSX | - | + |
| Idle States | + | + |
| Thermal Monitoring | + | + |
| Flex Memory Access | + | no data |
| SIPP | + | - |
| Turbo Boost Max 3.0 | + | - |
| Status | Discontinued | Launched |
| Deep Learning Boost | - | + |
Security technologies
Xeon W-10855M and Core i5-13400F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.
| TXT | + | + |
| EDB | + | + |
| Secure Key | + | + |
| Identity Protection | + | - |
| SGX | Yes with Intel® ME | no data |
| OS Guard | + | + |
Virtualization technologies
Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon W-10855M and Core i5-13400F are enumerated here.
| AMD-V | + | - |
| VT-d | + | + |
| VT-x | + | + |
| EPT | + | + |
Memory specs
Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon W-10855M and Core i5-13400F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.
| Supported memory types | DDR4 | DDR5, DDR4 |
| Maximum memory size | 128 GB | 192 GB |
| Max memory channels | 2 | 2 |
| Maximum memory bandwidth | 45.8 GB/s | 76.8 GB/s |
| ECC memory support | + | - |
Graphics specifications
General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.
| Integrated graphics card | Intel® UHD Graphics for 10th Gen Intel® Processors | no data |
| Quick Sync Video | + | - |
| Graphics max frequency | 1.2 GHz | no data |
Graphics interfaces
Available interfaces and connections of Xeon W-10855M and Core i5-13400F integrated GPUs.
| Number of displays supported | 3 | no data |
| eDP | + | no data |
| DisplayPort | + | - |
| HDMI | + | - |
| DVI | + | no data |
Graphics image quality
Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon W-10855M and Core i5-13400F integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.
| 4K resolution support | + | no data |
| Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 | 4096x2304@30Hz | no data |
| Max resolution over eDP | 4096x2304@60Hz | no data |
| Max resolution over DisplayPort | 4096x2304@60Hz | no data |
Graphics API support
APIs supported by Xeon W-10855M and Core i5-13400F integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.
| DirectX | 12 | no data |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | no data |
Peripherals
Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon W-10855M and Core i5-13400F.
| PCIe version | 3.0 | 5.0 and 4.0 |
| PCI Express lanes | 16 | 16 |
Synthetic benchmark performance
Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.
Passmark
Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.
GeekBench 5 Single-Core
GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core
GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 8.19 | 16.34 |
| Recency | 13 May 2020 | 4 January 2023 |
| Physical cores | 6 | 10 |
| Threads | 12 | 16 |
| Power consumption (TDP) | 45 Watt | 65 Watt |
Xeon W-10855M has 44.4% lower power consumption.
i5-13400F, on the other hand, has a 99.5% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 2 years, and 66.7% more physical cores and 33.3% more threads.
The Core i5-13400F is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon W-10855M in performance tests.
Be aware that Xeon W-10855M is a mobile workstation processor while Core i5-13400F is a desktop one.
Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon W-10855M and Core i5-13400F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.
Similar processor comparisons
We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.
