EPYC 9845 vs Xeon Silver 4510T

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Silver 4510T
2023
12 cores / 24 threads, 115 Watt
18.62
EPYC 9845
2024
160 cores / 320 threads, 390 Watt
87.20
+368%

EPYC 9845 outperforms Xeon Silver 4510T by a whopping 368% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Silver 4510T and EPYC 9845 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking3323
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation75.210.56
Market segmentServerServer
Power efficiency15.3921.25
Architecture codenameSapphire Rapids (2023−2024)Turin (2024)
Release date14 December 2023 (1 year ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$624$13,564

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Silver 4510T has 13330% better value for money than EPYC 9845.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Silver 4510T and EPYC 9845 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)160
Threads24320
Base clock speed2 GHz2.1 GHz
Boost clock speed3.7 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache80 KB (per core)80 KB (per core)
L2 cache2 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache30 MB (shared)320 MB (shared)
Chip lithographyIntel 7 nm3 nm
Maximum case temperature (TCase)84 °Cno data
64 bit support++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Silver 4510T and EPYC 9845 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketFCLGA4677SP5
Power consumption (TDP)115 Watt390 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Silver 4510T and EPYC 9845. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® AMX, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Silver 4510T and EPYC 9845 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
SGXYes with Intel® SPSno data
OS Guard+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Silver 4510T and EPYC 9845 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Silver 4510T and EPYC 9845. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR5 @ 4400 MT/s (1 DPC &2DPC)DDR5
Maximum memory size4 TBno data
Max memory channels8no data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardN/AN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Silver 4510T and EPYC 9845.

PCIe version55.0
PCI Express lanes80128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon Silver 4510T 18.62
EPYC 9845 87.20
+368%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Silver 4510T 29830
EPYC 9845 139712
+368%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 18.62 87.20
Recency 14 December 2023 10 October 2024
Physical cores 12 160
Threads 24 320
Power consumption (TDP) 115 Watt 390 Watt

Xeon Silver 4510T has 239.1% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9845, on the other hand, has a 368.3% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 9 months, and 1233.3% more physical cores and 1233.3% more threads.

The EPYC 9845 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Silver 4510T in performance tests.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Silver 4510T
Xeon Silver 4510T
AMD EPYC 9845
EPYC 9845

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


5 1 vote

Rate Xeon Silver 4510T on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9845 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon Silver 4510T and EPYC 9845, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.