EPYC 9124 vs Xeon Silver 4316

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Silver 4316
2021
20 cores / 40 threads, 150 Watt
20.26
EPYC 9124
2022
16 cores / 32 threads, 200 Watt
28.28
+39.6%

EPYC 9124 outperforms Xeon Silver 4316 by a considerable 40% based on our aggregated benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Silver 4316 and EPYC 9124 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking250155
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation24.8419.34
Market segmentServerServer
Seriesno dataAMD EPYC
Architecture codenameIce Lake-SP (2021)Genoa
Release date6 April 2021 (3 years ago)10 November 2022 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,083
Current price$1335 $1452 (1.3x MSRP)

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon Silver 4316 has 28% better value for money than EPYC 9124.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Silver 4316 and EPYC 9124 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores20 (Icosa-Core)16 (Hexadeca-Core)
Threads4032
Base clock speed2.3 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.4 GHz3.7 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)64K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1 MB (per core)
L3 cache30 MB (shared)64 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nm5 nm, 6 nm
Die sizeno data4x 72 mm2
Maximum core temperature84 °Cno data
Maximum case temperature (TCase)84 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data26,280 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Silver 4316 and EPYC 9124 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration22
SocketFCLGA4189SP5
Power consumption (TDP)150 Watt200 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Silver 4316 and EPYC 9124. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+no data
StatusLaunchedno data

Security technologies

Xeon Silver 4316 and EPYC 9124 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data
SGXYes with Intel® SPSno data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Silver 4316 and EPYC 9124 are enumerated here.

AMD-Vno data+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Silver 4316 and EPYC 9124. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2667DDR5-4800
Maximum memory size6 TB6 TiB
Max memory channels8no data
Maximum memory bandwidthno data460.8 GB/s
ECC memory support+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Silver 4316 and EPYC 9124.

PCIe version4.05.0
PCI Express lanes64128

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Silver 4316 20.26
EPYC 9124 28.28
+39.6%

EPYC 9124 outperforms Xeon Silver 4316 by 40% based on our aggregated benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon Silver 4316 31341
EPYC 9124 43743
+39.6%

EPYC 9124 outperforms Xeon Silver 4316 by 40% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 20.26 28.28
Recency 6 April 2021 10 November 2022
Physical cores 20 16
Threads 40 32
Chip lithography 10 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 150 Watt 200 Watt

The EPYC 9124 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Silver 4316 in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Silver 4316 and EPYC 9124, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Silver 4316
Xeon Silver 4316
AMD EPYC 9124
EPYC 9124

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.4 21 vote

Rate Xeon Silver 4316 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4 4 votes

Rate EPYC 9124 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Silver 4316 or EPYC 9124, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.