Core i5-12400F vs Xeon Silver 4309Y

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Silver 4309Y
2021
8 cores / 16 threads, 105 Watt
12.35
Core i5-12400F
2022
6 cores / 12 threads, 65 Watt
12.64
+2.3%

i5-12400F outperforms Xeon Silver 4309Y by a minimal 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Silver 4309Y and Core i5-12400F processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in performance ranking582565
Place by popularitynot in top-1004
Cost-effectiveness evaluation6.5386.18
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
Architecture codenameIce Lake-SP (2021)Alder Lake-S (2022)
Release date6 April 2021 (3 years ago)4 January 2022 (2 years ago)
Current price$2679 $110

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i5-12400F has 1220% better value for money than Xeon Silver 4309Y.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Silver 4309Y and Core i5-12400F basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)6 (Hexa-Core)
Threads1612
Base clock speed2.8 GHz2.5 GHz
Boost clock speed3.6 GHz4.4 GHz
L1 cache64K (per core)80K (per core)
L2 cache1 MB (per core)1.25 MB (per core)
L3 cache12 MB (shared)18 MB (shared)
Chip lithography10 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data163 mm2
Maximum core temperature76 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)76 °Cno data
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplierNoNo

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Silver 4309Y and Core i5-12400F compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration21
SocketFCLGA4189FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)105 Watt65 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Silver 4309Y and Core i5-12400F. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoringno data+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0no data-
StatusLaunchedLaunched

Security technologies

Xeon Silver 4309Y and Core i5-12400F technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
SGXYes with Intel® SPSno data
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Silver 4309Y and Core i5-12400F are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Silver 4309Y and Core i5-12400F. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2667DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200
Maximum memory size6 TB128 GB
Max memory channels82
Maximum memory bandwidthno data76.8 GB/s
ECC memory support+no data

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Silver 4309Y and Core i5-12400F.

PCIe version4.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes6420

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Silver 4309Y 12.35
i5-12400F 12.64
+2.3%

Core i5-12400F outperforms Xeon Silver 4309Y by 2% based on our aggregate benchmark results.


Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Benchmark coverage: 68%

Xeon Silver 4309Y 19100
i5-12400F 19547
+2.3%

Core i5-12400F outperforms Xeon Silver 4309Y by 2% in Passmark.

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.35 12.64
Recency 6 April 2021 4 January 2022
Physical cores 8 6
Threads 16 12
Power consumption (TDP) 105 Watt 65 Watt

Given the minimal performance differences, no clear winner can be declared between Xeon Silver 4309Y and Core i5-12400F.

Be aware that Xeon Silver 4309Y is a server/workstation processor while Core i5-12400F is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Silver 4309Y and Core i5-12400F, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Silver 4309Y
Xeon Silver 4309Y
Intel Core i5-12400F
Core i5-12400F

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 11 votes

Rate Xeon Silver 4309Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 11413 votes

Rate Core i5-12400F on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Silver 4309Y or Core i5-12400F, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.