EPYC 9455 vs Xeon Silver 4216

VS

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Silver 4216 and EPYC 9455 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking582not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation17.26no data
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon Silverno data
Power efficiency12.37no data
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Turin (2024)
Release date2 April 2019 (5 years ago)10 October 2024 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,002$5,412

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

no data

Detailed specifications

Xeon Silver 4216 and EPYC 9455 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)48 (Octatetraconta-Core)
Threads3296
Base clock speed2.1 GHz3.15 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz4.4 GHz
Multiplier21no data
L1 cache1 MB80 KB (per core)
L2 cache16 MB1 MB (per core)
L3 cache22 MB192 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nm4 nm
Die sizeno data6x 70.6 mm2
Maximum core temperature79 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data49,890 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility+no data

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Silver 4216 and EPYC 9455 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)2
SocketFCLGA3647SP5
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt300 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Silver 4216 and EPYC 9455. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Silver 4216 and EPYC 9455 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Silver 4216 and EPYC 9455 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Silver 4216 and EPYC 9455. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR5
Maximum memory size1 TBno data
Max memory channels6no data
Maximum memory bandwidth115.212 GB/sno data
ECC memory support+-

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Silver 4216 and EPYC 9455.

PCIe version3.05.0
PCI Express lanes48128

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 April 2019 10 October 2024
Physical cores 16 48
Threads 32 96
Chip lithography 14 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 300 Watt

Xeon Silver 4216 has 200% lower power consumption.

EPYC 9455, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, 200% more physical cores and 200% more threads, and a 250% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between Xeon Silver 4216 and EPYC 9455. We've got no test results to judge.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Silver 4216 and EPYC 9455, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Silver 4216
Xeon Silver 4216
AMD EPYC 9455
EPYC 9455

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 19 votes

Rate Xeon Silver 4216 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate EPYC 9455 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Silver 4216 or EPYC 9455, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.