i9-13900K vs Xeon Silver 4216

VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Silver 4216
2019
16 cores / 32 threads, 100 Watt
12.98
Core i9-13900K
2022
24 cores / 32 threads, 125 Watt
37.15
+186%

Core i9-13900K outperforms Xeon Silver 4216 by a whopping 186% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Silver 4216 and Core i9-13900K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking57889
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation17.4359.82
Market segmentServerDesktop processor
SeriesIntel Xeon SilverIntel Core i9
Power efficiency12.2813.90
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Raptor Lake, Raptor Cove, Gracemont (2022)
Release date2 April 2019 (5 years ago)27 September 2022 (2 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$1,002$589

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

i9-13900K has 243% better value for money than Xeon Silver 4216.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Silver 4216 and Core i9-13900K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores16 (Hexadeca-Core)24 (Tetracosa-Core)
Threads3232
Base clock speed2.1 GHz3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz5.7 GHz
Bus rateno data4 × 16 GT/s
Multiplier2130
L1 cache1 MB80K (per core)
L2 cache16 MB2 MB (per core)
L3 cache22 MB36 MB (shared)
Chip lithography14 nmIntel 7 nm
Die sizeno data257 mm2
Maximum core temperature79 °C100 °C
Maximum case temperature (TCase)no data72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++
Unlocked multiplier-+

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Silver 4216 and Core i9-13900K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA1700
Power consumption (TDP)100 Watt125 W, 253 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Silver 4216 and Core i9-13900K. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® SSE4.1, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX+-
Idle Statesno data+
Thermal Monitoring-+
SIPP-+
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-+
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Xeon Silver 4216 and Core i9-13900K technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++
Secure Keyno data+
OS Guardno data+

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Silver 4216 and Core i9-13900K are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Silver 4216 and Core i9-13900K. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR4, DDR5
Maximum memory size1 TB192 GB
Max memory channels62
Maximum memory bandwidth115.212 GB/s89.604 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataIntel UHD Graphics 770
Quick Sync Video-+
Clear Video HDno data+
Graphics max frequencyno data1.65 GHz
Execution Unitsno data32

Graphics interfaces

Available interfaces and connections of Xeon Silver 4216 and Core i9-13900K integrated GPUs.

Number of displays supportedno data4

Graphics image quality

Maximum display resolutions supported by Xeon Silver 4216 and Core i9-13900K integrated GPUs, including resolutions over different interfaces.

Max resolution over HDMI 1.4no data4096 x 2160 @ 60Hz
Max resolution over eDPno data5120 x 3200 @ 120Hz
Max resolution over DisplayPortno data7680 x 4320 @ 60Hz

Graphics API support

APIs supported by Xeon Silver 4216 and Core i9-13900K integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included.

DirectXno data12
OpenGLno data4.5

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Silver 4216 and Core i9-13900K.

PCIe version3.05.0 and 4.0
PCI Express lanes4820

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Silver 4216 12.98
i9-13900K 37.15
+186%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Silver 4216 20613
i9-13900K 59005
+186%

GeekBench 5 Single-Core

GeekBench 5 Single-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses only a single CPU core.

Xeon Silver 4216 1022
i9-13900K 3003
+194%

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core

GeekBench 5 Multi-Core is a cross-platform application developed in the form of CPU tests that independently recreate certain real-world tasks with which to accurately measure performance. This version uses all available CPU cores.

Xeon Silver 4216 7827
i9-13900K 20218
+158%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 12.98 37.15
Recency 2 April 2019 27 September 2022
Physical cores 16 24
Power consumption (TDP) 100 Watt 125 Watt

Xeon Silver 4216 has 25% lower power consumption.

i9-13900K, on the other hand, has a 186.2% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 3 years, and 50% more physical cores.

The Core i9-13900K is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Silver 4216 in performance tests.

Be aware that Xeon Silver 4216 is a server/workstation processor while Core i9-13900K is a desktop one.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Silver 4216 and Core i9-13900K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Silver 4216
Xeon Silver 4216
Intel Core i9-13900K
Core i9-13900K

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 19 votes

Rate Xeon Silver 4216 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 1924 votes

Rate Core i9-13900K on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Silver 4216 or Core i9-13900K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.