EPYC 7262 vs Xeon Silver 4215

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Silver 4215
2019, $794
8 cores / 16 threads, 85 Watt
7.61
EPYC 7262
2019, $575
8 cores / 16 threads, 155 Watt
11.87
+56%

EPYC 7262 outperforms Xeon Silver 4215 by an impressive 56% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking1148765
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation2.417.43
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon SilverAMD EPYC
Power efficiency3.783.23
DesignerIntelAMD
Manufacturerno dataTSMC
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Zen 2 (2019−2020)
Release date2 April 2019 (7 years ago)7 August 2019 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$794$575

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

EPYC 7262 has 208% better value for money than Xeon Silver 4215.

Performance to price scatter graph

Detailed specifications

Xeon Silver 4215 and EPYC 7262 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores8 (Octa-Core)8 (Octa-Core)
Threads1616
Base clock speed2.5 GHz3.2 GHz
Boost clock speed3.5 GHz3.4 GHz
Multiplier2532
L1 cache512 KB512 KB
L2 cache8 MB4 MB
L3 cache11 MB128 MB
Chip lithography14 nm7 nm, 14 nm
Die sizeno data4x 74 mm2
Maximum core temperature77 °Cno data
Number of transistorsno data15,200 million
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Silver 4215 and EPYC 7262 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)2 (Multiprocessor)
SocketFCLGA3647SP3
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt155 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Silver 4215 and EPYC 7262. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512no data
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro+no data
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)+no data
Speed Shift+no data
Turbo Boost Technology2.0no data
Hyper-Threading Technology+no data
TSX+-
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-no data
Precision Boost 2no data+
Deep Learning Boost+-

Security technologies

Xeon Silver 4215 and EPYC 7262 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT+no data
EDB+no data

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Silver 4215 and EPYC 7262 are enumerated here.

AMD-V-+
VT-d+no data
VT-x+no data
EPT+no data

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Silver 4215 and EPYC 7262. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR4 Eight-channel
Maximum memory size1 TB4 TiB
Max memory channels68
Maximum memory bandwidth115.212 GB/s204.763 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Graphics specifications

General parameters of integrated GPUs, if any.

Integrated graphics cardno dataN/A

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Silver 4215 and EPYC 7262.

PCIe version3.04.0
PCI Express lanes48128

Synthetic benchmarks

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating.

Xeon Silver 4215 7.61
EPYC 7262 11.87
+56%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance. Other than that, Passmark measures multi-core performance.

Xeon Silver 4215 13353
Samples: 11
EPYC 7262 20779
+55.6%
Samples: 12

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 7.61 11.87
Recency 2 April 2019 7 August 2019
Chip lithography 14 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 155 Watt

Xeon Silver 4215 has 82% lower power consumption.

EPYC 7262, on the other hand, has a 56% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 4 months, and a 100% more advanced lithography process.

The AMD EPYC 7262 is our recommended choice as it beats the Intel Xeon Silver 4215 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We've compiled a selection of CPU comparisons, ranging from closely matched processors to other comparisons that may be of interest.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 5 votes

Rate Xeon Silver 4215 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 21 votes

Rate EPYC 7262 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about processors Xeon Silver 4215 and EPYC 7262, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report bugs or inaccuracies on the site.