Xeon W-3235 vs Silver 4214Y

Aggregate performance score

Xeon Silver 4214Y
2019
12 cores / 24 threads, 85 Watt
10.35
Xeon W-3235
2019
12 cores / 24 threads, 180 Watt
16.10
+55.6%

Xeon W-3235 outperforms Xeon Silver 4214Y by an impressive 56% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

Comparing Xeon Silver 4214Y and Xeon W-3235 processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales start time and price.

Place in the ranking746412
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation16.6517.73
Market segmentServerServer
SeriesIntel Xeon SilverIntel Xeon W
Power efficiency11.528.46
Architecture codenameCascade Lake (2019−2020)Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
Release date2 April 2019 (5 years ago)3 June 2019 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$768$1,398

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

Performance per price, higher is better.

Xeon W-3235 has 6% better value for money than Xeon Silver 4214Y.

Detailed specifications

Xeon Silver 4214Y and Xeon W-3235 basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock state. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results.

Physical cores12 (Dodeca-Core)12 (Dodeca-Core)
Threads2424
Base clock speed2.2 GHz3.3 GHz
Boost clock speed3.2 GHz4.5 GHz
Bus typeno dataDMI 3.0
Bus rateno data4 × 8 GT/s
Multiplier2233
L1 cache768 KB768 KB
L2 cache12 MB12 MB
L3 cache16.5 MB19.25 MB
Chip lithography14 nm14 nm
Maximum core temperature77 °C72 °C
64 bit support++
Windows 11 compatibility++

Compatibility

Information on Xeon Silver 4214Y and Xeon W-3235 compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket type), power supply unit (look for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. Note that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, even without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters.

Number of CPUs in a configuration2 (Multiprocessor)1 (Uniprocessor)
SocketFCLGA3647FCLGA3647
Power consumption (TDP)85 Watt180 Watt

Technologies and extensions

Technological solutions and additional instructions supported by Xeon Silver 4214Y and Xeon W-3235. You'll probably need this information if you require some particular technology.

Instruction set extensionsIntel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX, Intel® AVX2, Intel® AVX-512Intel® AVX-512
AES-NI++
AVX++
vPro++
Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST)++
Speed Shift++
Turbo Boost Technology2.02.0
Hyper-Threading Technology++
TSX++
Turbo Boost Max 3.0-+
Deep Learning Boost++

Security technologies

Xeon Silver 4214Y and Xeon W-3235 technologies aimed at improving security, for example, by protecting against hacks.

TXT++
EDB++

Virtualization technologies

Virtual machine speed-up technologies supported by Xeon Silver 4214Y and Xeon W-3235 are enumerated here.

VT-d++
VT-x++
EPT++

Memory specs

Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon Silver 4214Y and Xeon W-3235. Depending on the motherboard, higher memory frequencies may be supported.

Supported memory typesDDR4-2400DDR4-2933
Maximum memory size1 TB1 TB
Max memory channels66
Maximum memory bandwidth115.212 GB/s140.8 GB/s
ECC memory support++

Peripherals

Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon Silver 4214Y and Xeon W-3235.

PCIe version3.03.0
PCI Express lanes4864

Synthetic benchmark performance

Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, higher is better.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly.

Xeon Silver 4214Y 10.35
Xeon W-3235 16.10
+55.6%

Passmark

Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of 8 different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. There is also one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core performance.

Xeon Silver 4214Y 16442
Xeon W-3235 25578
+55.6%

Gaming performance

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 10.35 16.10
Recency 2 April 2019 3 June 2019
Power consumption (TDP) 85 Watt 180 Watt

Xeon Silver 4214Y has 111.8% lower power consumption.

Xeon W-3235, on the other hand, has a 55.6% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 2 months.

The Xeon W-3235 is our recommended choice as it beats the Xeon Silver 4214Y in performance tests.


Should you still have questions on choice between Xeon Silver 4214Y and Xeon W-3235, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Vote for your favorite

Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite CPU.


Intel Xeon Silver 4214Y
Xeon Silver 4214Y
Intel Xeon W-3235
Xeon W-3235

Similar processor comparisons

We picked several similar comparisons of processors in the same market segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page.

Community ratings

Here you can see how users rate the processors, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate Xeon Silver 4214Y on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 22 votes

Rate Xeon W-3235 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Questions & comments

Here you can ask a question about Xeon Silver 4214Y or Xeon W-3235, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.